Afaque24 wrote:
" Infact advantage is not the right word,the right word is cheating, yes cheating, because basically pawn is doing something that is not in it's set of rules. "
Chess is supposed to represent the battle ground. The pawn has a range that allows him to attack diagonally in front one square. In a real life battle if somebody moves within the range of a soldier's attack, they will be killed. When a pawn moves two squares pass another pawn, it has moved through the pawn's range of attack, therefore it makes perfect sense according to the rules of a pawn.
pawns can move two spaces, past the attacking square of knight, bishop, rook, queen or king. those pieces are soldiers on the battlefield as well, so why can't they en passant?
Afaque24 wrote:
" Infact advantage is not the right word,the right word is cheating, yes cheating, because basically pawn is doing something that is not in it's set of rules. "
Chess is supposed to represent the battle ground. The pawn has a range that allows him to attack diagonally in front one square. In a real life battle if somebody moves within the range of a soldier's attack, they will be killed. When a pawn moves two squares pass another pawn, it has moved through the pawn's range of attack, therefore it makes perfect sense according to the rules of a pawn.