is this a problem? Why my 2 accounts anxious you? I accidentally paid for the membership here and that is why use it. So, what is a problem?
Engine or Human ?!
Sort:
0rxan wrote:
is this a problem? Why my 2 accounts anxious you? I accidentally paid for the membership here and that is why use it. So, what is a problem?
You accidentally paid for membership? Amazing. No wonder s/he beat you.
You can't have multiple accounts. Period.
Breakingbad12, are you reading my comments ?! (Ok, I will block another one till membership will end.)
0rxan wrote:
His rating is 1911, not engine rating.
I think my statement flew over your head....but then you arent 1900 are you?
Yes, I am. Why? 1846 now.
breakingbad12 wrote:
Yep, in the endgame he started to play by himself. He's a cheater.
Again...what 1900 rated engine did he use because he didnt use a top rated engine to cheat.
White missed several moves a low depth SF saw right away.
OK, everyone is a victim these days....but black magic being used seems more plausible.
0rxan wrote:
Yes, I am. Why? 1846 now.
So who is playing on this account that you are posting under? A 1000 rated engine?
Apr 9, 2018
0
#31
White missed a lot of stuff too. It's always possible that White wasn't human, but the play wasn't as exceptional as you make it out to be.
nighteyes1234 wrote:
breakingbad12 wrote:
Yep, in the endgame he started to play by himself. He's a cheater.
Again...what 1900 rated engine did he use because he didnt use a top rated engine to cheat.
White missed several moves a low depth SF saw right away.
OK, everyone is a victim these days....but black magic being used seems more plausible.
Yes, he used a top engine. According to SF9 his average centipawn loss is 7, as I said before.
SmyslovFan wrote:
White missed a lot of stuff too. It's always possible that White wasn't human, but the play wasn't as exceptional as you make it out to be.
Thank you for exact comment. Check some of another comment, I am talking life story here. 
)
breakingbad12 wrote:
I'm quite sure your opponent used an engine. According to Stockfish 9, his average centipaw loss is 7, which is super gm level.
It's not uncommon for someone rated 1900 to have average centipawn loss of 7 in a game. I have had games with 5 or 6 centipawn loss and I am not even 1900.
I'm not saying this guy isn't a cheater (I think he is), but calling someone a cheater based on their centipawn loss of one game is ridiculous.
Well, Thank you All for comments. As the head, I do not say he/she is engine player or not. I open discussion.
2. For some of you guys, has a accounts problem. Be sure that I will handle it. Thank you for your reaction!
3. I am not a professional chess player (I mean not playing since childhood). Only play more time games.
JordanNexhip wrote:
breakingbad12 wrote:
I'm quite sure your opponent used an engine. According to Stockfish 9, his average centipaw loss is 7, which is super gm level.
It's not uncommon for someone rated 1900 to have average centipawn loss of 7 in a game. I have had games with 5 or 6 centipawn loss and I am not even 1900.
I'm not saying this guy isn't a cheater (I think he is), but calling someone a cheater based on their centipawn loss of one game is ridiculous.
Hi. Could you please post these games? Thanks.
I bet he will not post, but whatever.
Ehh. I played a daily game recently where both of ours came back near flawless. You have to also look at the best move percentage.