Fabiano Caruana and Hikaru Nakamura

What places Fabiano Caruana above all chess players except Magnus Carlsen? I believe it's how well balanced his chess skills are, his youth, and his psychological strength.

Compare him to Nakamura. Nakamura seems to be unable to "wait" in a chess came. He will play moves that weaken his position just to make the game more dynamic. This is his style. But the chess players at the pinnacle will exploit the slightest "second best" move. Believe it or not, Nakamura is already getting "old." His chance to become world champion (if he ever realistically had one considering his playing style) is probably over.

Nakamura is also not psychologically strong. You can tell that he plays "the opponent" more than he plays "the board." This is a psychological weakness.

Caruana is also getting world-class coaching from Alexander Chernin. Fabiano has always taken his training very seriously (moving to Europe at age twelve).

Nakamura does not seem to be utilizing a coach(s) as much. 

I would like to see Nakamura become world champion, but I believe his chances are extremely low now. And if he did become world champion, he would almost certainly lose the title on his first defense like Tal did. Their styles make for exciting chess but that type of play will always be defeated in the long run by a more solid style like Carlsen's and Caruana's.

Yes, Caruana lost those games when he was younger (obviously) and still getting stronger (which he is obviously still doing). Caruana won their last game using his superior skills mentioned in the OP.

I found it amusing that a couple of years ago Nakamura complained that Caruana was gaining rating points because he was playing in "weaker tournaments." This shows Nakamura's psychological weakness. He should be working on improving is chess rather than making excuses about why other players are gaining rating points. I think Nakamura should now think about why Caruana is 5-0 in the strongest tournament EVER and Nakamura is in LAST PLACE. Again, I like Nakamura but he obviously needs to fix some holes in his game.

Hikaru has all the talent he needs but he seems to play to much bullet and blitz and I feel like it causes him to play ever so slightly looser in classical chess.

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/help-support/bughouse-and-live-960

If you want to be polite, then don't post a link to your question that has nothing to do with this thread. You are wasting people's time.

Not much until this tournament and people are freaking out... until the next few tournaments of course, when they'll forget.

Probably not considering Carlsen is his Kryptonite, is slightly younger, ~100 points stronger, and as you said psychologically more stable.

There is not much humanity in elite chess.

There were a few who became WC in their 30s.  I think Fischer was 29 or 30.

But in Anand's case it seemed to be a small window between Kasparov's retirement and the next generation's arrival at the very top.  When a still improving player takes the WC in their early 20s, they tend to hold onto it... e.g. Kasparov.  I don't think 10 years later suddenly Naka will be better than Carlsen, although I guess anything is possible.

MVL and Caruana are still improving though.  I think they're the ones to keep an eye on.

From Wikipedia, the foremost authority on all subjects ;-)

"His contemporaries used to say that Lasker used a "psychological" approach to the game, and even that he sometimes deliberately played inferior moves to confuse opponents. Recent analysis, however, indicates that he was ahead of his time and used a more flexible approach than his contemporaries, which mystified many of them. Lasker knew contemporary analyses of openings well but disagreed with many of them."

---

There is a much greater understanding of chess now than in Lasker's day. Lasker understood chess better than anyone else in his day and that's why he was world champion for 27 years.

This article is worth reading even if some people have a knee-jerk negative reaction for ANYTHING on Wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanuel_Lasker

Caruana 6 - 0  DOMINATION

It's settled then.

From Chessbase News – September 3, 2014

"Namamura repeated a line he tried against Carlsen last year, but he obtained next to nothing then and he obtained next to nothing now (Against Aronian). Aronian tried to spice up the game after his opponent wasted two moves without any real purpose.

However the Armenian might have over-pressed and his passed d-pawn was weaker than it seemed. Nakamura missed his chance to play around the pawn and capture it later, and instead attacked it too quickly. This let Aronian counter-attack the weak c4 pawn and after the trade of pawns the draw became very likely."

--

Kasparov Tweet – Did Nakamura really play Q from e1 to a5 & back to e1? Too subtle for this old retiree!

--

During yesterday’s commentary of Caruan’s game, both Yasser Seirawan and Maurice Ashley pointed out that Caruana was being patient, building up his position, and not attacking too early.

--

Nakamura's and Caruana's play directly follows my comments made in the OP -

 “What places Fabiano Caruana above all chess players except Magnus Carlsen? I believe it's how well balanced his chess skills are, his youth, and his psychological strength.

Compare him to Nakamura. Nakamura seems to be unable to "wait" in a chess came. He will play moves that weaken his position just to make the game more dynamic. This is his style. But the chess players at the pinnacle will exploit the slightest "second best" move.

Let's hope Caruana wins again today!

Botvinnik was a communist , I dont think commies are known much for their " humanity " .  

Of course he was, he thrived and succeeded in one and it recognized and supported him with advancing chess. 

I'm not saying communism is good bad or otherwise but why wouldn't he be if the Soviet Union benefitted him?

In America you have people who either like capitalism for what it does for them or hate it because of what it does to them.

If I had cancer I'd rather die and give my stuff to the next of kin than go broke and homeless getting it cured (considering how in demand and needed such a medicine would be you'd bet they'd mark it the hell up at maybe $500 per pill) since that's no way to live life, that's an extreme example of the problems of capitalism.

Believe it or not, you can actually have beliefs based on how a system affects your community, not just yourself.

Why are you posting this on this thread? This had nothing to do with the thread's subject. You are wasting people's time. Go start your own thread if you want to talk about Botvinnik and communism.

7 - 0 ??

Round 7 - After 12 moves Nakamura is almost lost.

Nakamura loses again.