Finally!! A actual human who manages to beat Stockfish!!

Sort:
magipi
whiqqy1 wrote:

This is true stockfish sees it can survive so it takes the pieces even though it does run into problems it is the best move so it plays it

This is still nonsense. Not true. You can't exploit the engine's weakness by stupid stuff. Not possible.

Davilacerda12
Jacobshinn escreveu:
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:

And this is ladies and gentlemen, an example of how weak online chess engines are.

Prediction: He won't try to replicate the feat against his local SF 12.

To be fair, he only managed to beat the Stockfish engine on Lichess.com, but I haven't seen him play against it on chess.com, so, we'll wait and see if he has any videos on that.

Actually, the stockfish engine beats the chess.com engine most the time. I dont know if it is in analysis mode, but overall the engines on stockfish are really good, equal or better than chess.com's

Davilacerda12
nklristic escreveu:
Jacobshinn wrote:

So there's this guy I just found on YouTube named Jonathan Schrantz. He uploaded a video called: Human defeats Stockfish with Urusov Gambit. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FC2P6VUYu78He even made a video on how to defeat Stockfish: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtJeE0Th7rk&t= How cool is that? Finally we have a human literally showing us that he has defeated Stockfish, and showed us how to actually do it! Great news for chess players, really bad news for cheaters everywhere.

As far as I understand, that is not the full strength stockfish engine. That is the strongest cpu player on that site (probably it is comparable to cpu level 10 on chess.com). Those are nowhere near 3 400 elo strength or whatever is the strength of newest stockfish. They are probably over 2 000 and that is about it. Don't get me wrong, that is still a great feat, but probably every player over 2 000 FIDE would have a realistic chance to do it from time to time.

Actually, the lichess engine is better tgan chess.com engines most the time

mrspractice

I saw a you tube channel named "Leptocorisa acuta" in which he /she teaches us how to beat Stockfish. He/ She has beaten Stockfish 15.1 two times and 2 draws. I am not sure whether he/she is human or ....

alexanderchew60

I don't think that anyone (even Magnus himself) can defeat Stockfish 16 (the newest version of Stockfish). You can't even win with a computer (if you use any other kind of chess computer, you lose; if you use Stockfish 16, it's a draw).

magipi
alexanderchew60 wrote:

You can't even win with a computer (if you use any other kind of chess computer, you lose; if you use Stockfish 16, it's a draw).

This is obviously untrue. Hardware is more important than software. If you run SF 15 on a supercomputer and SF 16 on a laptop, the older version will win easily.

VTSGMaster8
Better beat it while you can before it becomes literally perfect…
AdvikTripathy2309
drmrboss wrote:
Jacobshinn wrote:

So there's this guy I just found on YouTube named Jonathan Schrantz. He uploaded a video called: Human defeats Stockfish with Urusov Gambit. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FC2P6VUYu78He even made a video on how to defeat Stockfish: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtJeE0Th7rk&t= How cool is that? Finally we have a human literally showing us that he has defeated Stockfish, and showed us how to actually do it! Great news for chess players, really bad news for cheaters everywhere.

Lol, the guy you impressed is just 2300 in blitz and 2200 in bullet. ( similar rating to me). I am 2300 bullet and 2200 blitz.

What a click bait video and what a horrible person who believe whatever you see in youtube.

Bro just check rapid and classical rating first then come to blitz and bullet

LeventK11111111

Ok so this is still kinda active

Who-am-i-bruh

Being honest, stockfish was a raining champion when it was a robot back then, but the funny part was that someone was controlling it

mickeystickey
DanielRocksAtChess wrote:

Actually?

I think this guy is referring to the Mechanical Chess Robot named "The Turk" it was an old chess "Computer/Machine" developed in 1770. People thought it was a mechanism with an autonomous chess playing capability. It was taken on a world tour for 84 years around the world. Where world leaders and other political figures would play the machine. It was later revealed that the secret to the "Mechanical Turk" was a world-class player hidden in one of the compartments of the device operating and playing out the chess matches.

justinwow1234

or ask ur mom if u have one

cuddlebear0007

I beat maximum on chess.com what do I do now

AGC-Gambit_YT
wrote:

So there's this guy I just found on YouTube named Jonathan Schrantz. He uploaded a video called: Human defeats Stockfish with Urusov Gambit. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FC2P6VUYu78He even made a video on how to defeat Stockfish: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtJeE0Th7rk&t= How cool is that? Finally we have a human literally showing us that he has defeated Stockfish, and showed us how to actually do it! Great news for chess players, really bad news for cheaters everywhere.

Wow, you seem gullible.

AGC-Gambit_YT
wrote:
NikkiLikeChikki wrote:
I guess the way to beat an engine is to know 20 moves of theory on something it initially thinks is unsound and tries to punish. It then walks into a trap. That way you already know what lies beyond the engine’s calculation horizon.
I play the Urosov gambit often, but chess.com call it the Ponziani gambit.

Yeah, even computers like Stockfish will eventually make a mistake.

NAHHHH