Fischer vs. "regular" 2700 GM today

In a hypothetical situation, with Bobby Fischer in his prime coming off a world championship in 1972, and a typical elite grandmaster (in the 2700 range) today, who would you pick to win a seven-game match? Assume that Fischer has only the resources of 1972 to prepare and the 2700-rated grandmaster has modern day preparation/material on his side, and that otherwise all conditions are equal. 

I think Fischer would do what he did to 2731 to 2752 rated candidates in 1971 that resulted in his rating reaching 2985 in Oct. 1971.

In the 1971 Candidates knock-out matches, Fischer beat Taimanov, rated 2731, 6-0 in the Quarterfinals. Fischer's performance rating was 2870. Then be beat Larsen, rated 2752, 6-0 in the Semifinals. Fischer's performance rating was 2887. Then, ill during the Candidates Finals, he beat the previous World Champion, Petrosian, rated 2738, 5W, 3D, 1L. Fischer's performance rating was 2805.

It's not fair to limit Fischer to 1971 chess information and let his opponents have 2018 info.

I played an OTB tournament in 2000 and didn't get back into chess until 2016. It was like that Star Trek time-travel episode where the 1970's jet fighter pilot got beamed aboad the Starship Enterprise!  The ease of locating information, the help from chess engines and improved training, etc. are incredible now compared to 2000 alone.  If Bobby Fischer had today's information available, his rating would certainly be over 3000.

Of course, he'd still be semi-insane and a pain in the butt.  During the height of the Cold War in 1972, Fischer's behavior toward Spassky was so awful, one American newspaper letter-to-the-editor wrote, "Only Bobby Fischer could make America root for the Russian!"

I'd pick Fischer.

Only a few people could equal him in technical play and endgame play. He'd grind down your average super GM simply because he's the better player.

A 2700 GM today would memorize every supercomputer line and every Fischer game. Fischer would do something out of the ordinary and the GM will run out of time thinking what to do

Seven games might be too short a match for Fischer to adapt to modern opening prep. In a 24-game match, I would put my money on Fischer, though.

They could spin it as a Zombie movie. 

Night of the Living Dead GM!

If Fischer, at the height of his powers, had the opportunity to sit down and catch up on opening theory, and play with the strong computers of today, then it would be a question of his ability at chess. Would he then be able to walk over Magnus Carlsen the way that he did Boris Spassky? Or would it be a close match? That's the question I'm curious about.

That he could mop up the floor with the ordinary Grandmasters of today, like he did to the ordinary Grandmasters of his day, would simply be what one might expect; if it isn't the case, I'd be surprised.

When comparing the strenght of different era chess players you have to compare the personality, the genius, the will and all the qualities of the person. The weakest soldier with a gun can kill the greatest warrior of the ancien Rome. But you have to give them the same conditions for comparing. A Fischer like an Alekhine or a Morphy would dominate the era in wich they grew up, as it happend in facts