The chess game is always some sort of a compromise between a pure chess skill and time you have on your hand (unless it is some sort of a correspondence game). For games you play, time is a bigger factor than in longer games.
If I have a completely winning position and lose on time, it means my opponent had a better balance between chess skill and time usage and deserved to win. If that is not the case, why are we having different time controls at all.
We will not agree on this, so I will stop here.
Agree that we can't agree...
How can you put at the same level a chess player and someone who think only to win despite any moral obligation?
BTW, I've just lost for 0.03s, from a position of 6.5 of advantage... are we sure it's a matter of beeing better? really really? is in the balance considerd also the connection lag (just an example of how much your way of thinking is fragile...)
You mean... a game such as this one:
I am sure you've lost sleep over that one. After all, it is so morally wrong to win these type of games.
To quote you:
--------------------------------
(just an example of how much your way of thinking is fragile...)
-------------------------------
What you are doing is accepting the rules of the game, and then are dissatisfied when they don't go your way.
When you are so insistent, if you are so against flagging, why didn't you resign games such as these as well:
Completely lost for you, so it is really not nice of you to win this game.
Or how about this win of yours:
I guess when you win such games, it is morally correct to do so.
happy you have a long time to spend to look on all my matches...
Not really. All it takes is just clicking on let's say your bullet rating, or blitz or rapid, doesn't matter which (then full stats, then completed games). Then you look at the right and list wins by timeout (you can list games by various other things as well). It is enough to hover over a few such games (and see the end position) to find such examples quickly.
All these are from the page 1 of bullet or blitz, and I didn't even went through the whole page, far from it.
No need to look how many you've lost, surely you've lost a fair share of such games, as you are playing speed chess, it would be illogical if you didn't. Safe to say, there are plenty of both. In any case, you are complaining about something you've been doing regularly yourself, which is diminishing the strength of your case.
sometimes happens, of course... nobody is a saint.
If you say "on regular basis" I should feel really defame... Lucky, I don't really care about a flagger opinion 
Not at all. He took more time to find better moves so that means you're better.
Even if he had a better position, he took more time to get that so...he gambled his time vs a better position and lost.
There's no disrespect about it. He knew the rules and he lost.