I am a mid-900 rated player so I play against other players in the 850 to 1050 range. However, when I go into game Review I am evaluated by an 3500 rated engine (or whatever the engine rating is). The engine regularly points out moves I should have made based on my opponent and I playing a series of perfect moves, which I can tell neither me nor my opponents are capable of playing. Showing me a series of 5 or 6 or more moves doesn't help me because they will never happen in my games.
I want to be a 3500 some day (OK, my goals are lower than that for now, but you get my point) but for now I need help getting to the next level. For the most part the suggested moves in the review seem to be at a level that I simply can't perform at yet.
Is there any way the engine in the review could take the player's rating into account and make suggestions that are more likely to be part of my games?
Some of the move classifications and the accuracies do take rating into account and a more a little more forgivable.
If you want something less strong, decreasing the review strength is the only option and can be found in the analysis settings.
I am a mid-900 rated player so I play against other players in the 850 to 1050 range. However, when I go into game Review I am evaluated by an 3500 rated engine (or whatever the engine rating is). The engine regularly points out moves I should have made based on my opponent and I playing a series of perfect moves, which I can tell neither me nor my opponents are capable of playing. Showing me a series of 5 or 6 or more moves doesn't help me because they will never happen in my games.
I want to be a 3500 some day (OK, my goals are lower than that for now, but you get my point) but for now I need help getting to the next level. For the most part the suggested moves in the review seem to be at a level that I simply can't perform at yet.
Is there any way the engine in the review could take the player's rating into account and make suggestions that are more likely to be part of my games?