I won 400 elo points in 20 days - Chess Forums

notmtwain

Jul 26, 2018

0

#1

Alltheusernamestaken wrote:

Since I started to understand the meaning of the moves and stopped playing the Pirc, going back to giuoco piano I got quite amazing results in the last 300+ games. It took me 3 months to go from 700 to 1100 and 20 days to go from 1100 to 1500.

Did anyone have had a similar experience? if so, why?

I guess you were just incorrectly rated to start.

Alltheusernamestaken

Jul 26, 2018

0

#2

notmtwain wrote:

Alltheusernamestaken wrote:

Since I started to understand the meaning of the moves and stopped playing the Pirc, going back to giuoco piano I got quite amazing results in the last 300+ games. It took me 3 months to go from 700 to 1100 and 20 days to go from 1100 to 1500.

Did anyone have had a similar experience? if so, why?

I guess you were just incorrectly rated to start.

Then why it took me 3 months to go from 700 to 1100?

Btw I had almost never played chess before

notmtwain

Jul 27, 2018

0

#3

Well that's very impressive. It's certainly a much faster improvement than most people manage. Did you study with anyone?

cellomaster8

Jul 27, 2018

0

#4

You were underrated or you just studied very hard

Alltheusernamestaken

Jul 27, 2018

0

#5

notmtwain wrote:

Well that's very impressive. It's certainly a much faster improvement than most people manage. Did you study with anyone?

You know when you are trying to beat a level of a videogame and you try the same tactic every time instead of trying something else? I just changed my way to play.

notmtwain

Aug 31, 2018

0

#6

radish11 wrote:

This is not even remotely impressive because you used an engine in most of these games. Take for example this game. Perfect play all 27 moves.

You aren't allowed to make cheating accusations in the forum. If you want to report someone, use the report button(!) Or send an email to support@chess.com.

superchessmachine

Aug 31, 2018

0

#7

EXPOSED!

ehashi

Aug 31, 2018

0

#8

rip OP.

ehashi

Aug 31, 2018

0

#9

rip OP.

aa-ron1235

Aug 31, 2018

0

#10

in berfore lock

Alltheusernamestaken

Oct 12, 2018

0

#11

Well none of you are smart at all. The ratio of best move I have on this 4 games is 75% and it's 10 min games so it's not strange at all. The guy who posted them clearly chose games where my opponent played bad and I played good or where my opponent played a very known opening for me like the wayward or the alapin gambit wich i studied at that time (for example on the third my opponent played 35% best move) he showed no loss or close win. I could do the same to all of you and it would even have more sense becouse since then I have lost elo.

cellomaster8

Oct 12, 2018

0

#12

“Well none of you is smart at all”

And you “is” smart?

Alltheusernamestaken

Oct 12, 2018

0

#13

cellomaster8 wrote:

“Well none of you is smart at all”

And you “is” smart?

I'm not native english and I speak 3 idioms so some mistakes may appear when I type fast

cellomaster8

Oct 12, 2018

0

#14

Ok

M_L_1

Oct 13, 2018

0

#15

I got same so f u

JustOneUSer

Oct 13, 2018

0

#16

Between 1100 and 1500 some amount of skill is involved.

Between 500 and 1000 basically "not losing your queen before the tenth move" will win you many matches.

JamesAgadir

Oct 13, 2018

0

#17

Your play is sometimes exceptionally good. I took two random games and you had below 0.1 centipawn loss in both game with 80 and 70% best moves. That is the kind of play I would find surprising from a 2000 rated player in a rapid game (I have seen a player been banned for keeping those stats consistently). On the other hand you play games with 30% best moves and 0,4 centipawn loss. The sample size is quite small because you seem to win a lot of miniatures.

I am not accusing you of anything. I am just saying if you can play that well consistently then a 2000 rating should be easy to attain. I'd put bets on you getting a title at some point. Though that level of play might be harder to keep up during longer games.

Alltheusernamestaken

Oct 13, 2018

0

#18

JamesAgadir wrote:

Your play is sometimes exceptionally good. I took two random games and you had below 0.1 centipawn loss in both game with 80 and 70% best moves. That is the kind of play I would find surprising from a 2000 rated player in a rapid game (I have seen a player been banned for keeping those stats consistently). On the other hand you play games with 30% best moves and 0,4 centipawn loss. The sample size is quite small because you seem to win a lot of miniatures.

I am not accusing you of anything. I am just saying if you can play that well consistently then a 2000 rating should be easy to attain. I'd put bets on you getting a title at some point. Though that level of play might be harder to keep up during longer games.

I win a lot of miniatures??? I don't think so I won a 2-3 yesterday but have you seen them? I'm not even playing best moves, I just got lucky playing against people that doesn't know their openings!

Anyway I'm simply not cheating and it's obvious, I have improved my 10 min rating lately but I'm 80 points below my record that I achieved months ago playing lots of hours everyday. Now I'm just playing for fun as I enjoy more working on opening theory.

JamesAgadir

Oct 13, 2018

0

#19

Alltheusernamestaken a écrit :

JamesAgadir wrote:

Your play is sometimes exceptionally good. I took two random games and you had below 0.1 centipawn loss in both game with 80 and 70% best moves. That is the kind of play I would find surprising from a 2000 rated player in a rapid game (I have seen a player been banned for keeping those stats consistently). On the other hand you play games with 30% best moves and 0,4 centipawn loss. The sample size is quite small because you seem to win a lot of miniatures.

I am not accusing you of anything. I am just saying if you can play that well consistently then a 2000 rating should be easy to attain. I'd put bets on you getting a title at some point. Though that level of play might be harder to keep up during longer games.

I win a lot of miniatures??? I don't think so I won a 2-3 yesterday but have you seen them? I'm not even playing best moves, I just got lucky playing against people that doesn't know their openings!

Anyway I'm simply not cheating and it's obvious, I have improved my 10 min rating lately but I'm 80 points below my record that I achieved months ago playing lots of hours everyday. Now I'm just playing for fun as I enjoy more working on opening theory.

Of the games on your main page that are 10minute games all 3 of them last less then 23moves and two are miniatures. though the sample size is small that's a lot of miniatures.

In my last 50 wins I have had 2 miniatures and 4 games of 23 moves or less. And that's including a game where my opponent resigned on move 3.

Alltheusernamestaken

Oct 13, 2018

0

#20

JamesAgadir wrote:

Alltheusernamestaken a écrit :

JamesAgadir wrote:

Your play is sometimes exceptionally good. I took two random games and you had below 0.1 centipawn loss in both game with 80 and 70% best moves. That is the kind of play I would find surprising from a 2000 rated player in a rapid game (I have seen a player been banned for keeping those stats consistently). On the other hand you play games with 30% best moves and 0,4 centipawn loss. The sample size is quite small because you seem to win a lot of miniatures.

I am not accusing you of anything. I am just saying if you can play that well consistently then a 2000 rating should be easy to attain. I'd put bets on you getting a title at some point. Though that level of play might be harder to keep up during longer games.

I win a lot of miniatures??? I don't think so I won a 2-3 yesterday but have you seen them? I'm not even playing best moves, I just got lucky playing against people that doesn't know their openings!

Anyway I'm simply not cheating and it's obvious, I have improved my 10 min rating lately but I'm 80 points below my record that I achieved months ago playing lots of hours everyday. Now I'm just playing for fun as I enjoy more working on opening theory.

Of the games on your main page that are 10minute games all 3 of them last less then 23moves and two are miniatures. though the sample size is small that's a lot of miniatures.

In my last 50 wins I have had 2 miniatures and 4 games of 23 moves or less. And that's including a game where my opponent resigned on move 3.

Dude I lost 4 and won 3 -.-

Do you call this cheating?