OMG! 100$ is just tooooooo much... when you are rated 1000-1800 these lessons can be useful but after that you can get going on your own
Grandmaster Coaching: When is it worth it?



A GM will have deeper knowledge of the game than another titled player, but not necessarily better coaching skills.
So at the end of the day, it's your choice.
PS : there are less expensive GMs too, for example GM Nigel Davies charges ~40$/hr.

I've heard some horror stories about GM coaching, that some are basically cashing in on their title and have no real coaching skill.
I'd defintely go with a Master or even Expert who cared about their clients and knew how to coach.


You're not just paying for the hour they are talking to you, but also the additional hours of reviewing your game, analyzing your style and collecting example games that show how to correct your behavior. think about how much prep work goes in to the training that custom just for you.
I would rather buy a $20 book written by a grandmaster and good for 200 hours of coaching, than pay $200 for 1 hour of grandmaster coaching.

Good coaching is not necessarily proportionate to ELO Rating. A good coach wants to know two things about you:
1. Your goal.
2. Your playstyle.
Only by clearly defining these two things can a player be sure he is investing properly into his understanding of Chess. A +400 difference in Ratings and a definite plan is really all it takes for a productive student-coach relationship.
Hey everyone, I just wanted to ask a question to the chess community about coaching. Is hiring a grandmaster as a chess coach worth it? Most GMs charge $100/hr which I think is a lot. I understand that you are paying someone for their expertise and skill, but what makes their coaching far better than a NM, or FM, etc. If you are rated just about 2000 OTB, is it worth it to pay that much for lessons? When is it worth it to pay that much for lessons?