Cosmicharmonic has a point. Aronian is still a worthy contender.
Contender of? Being a punching bag for magnus Carlsen? Aronian is not going to have a growth rate anywhere near Carlsen's because he is 32 years old. Caruana is rated roughly the same as him but is 10 years younger. Aronian was never Carlsen's kryptonite to begin with looking at their head to head score. Aronian is good at tournaments, but he's weak when it counts. Look at the candidates tournaments to see his poor performance as the tournament "favourite". He will never challenge Carlsen for the title let alone beat him.
32 is still a young age for a chess player. Fischer became the WCC at 32. Aronian has a +4/-9 record against Carlsen, while Caruana is +3/-5 against Carlsen. Caruana is slightly better in this aspect, but Aronian is not to be dismissed.
Cosmicharmonic has a point. Aronian is still a worthy contender.
Contender of? Being a punching bag for magnus Carlsen? Aronian is not going to have a growth rate anywhere near Carlsen's because he is 32 years old. Caruana is rated roughly the same as him but is 10 years younger. Aronian was never Carlsen's kryptonite to begin with looking at their head to head score. Aronian is good at tournaments, but he's weak when it counts. Look at the candidates tournaments to see his poor performance as the tournament "favourite". He will never challenge Carlsen for the title let alone beat him.