How many active members on Chess.com?

Sort:
Martin_Stahl

Heck, by your definition, I don't think I would qualify as active grin

llama36
Martin_Stahl wrote:
llama36 wrote:

But you only used Rapid? You realize some people exclusively play blitz or daily etc.

It's hard to imagine there are 20 million "active" members. If we define active as playing on at least 10 different day in a month, for at least 3 consecutive months, then I'm imagining something more like 500,000.

....

 

Rapid gives a lower bound based on the activity criteria of at least 20 games in the pool in the last 90 days.

 

Sure you can define active in any way you want, which will change the numbers.

 

There are over 300,000 members online right now and almost 12 million games have been played in the last 24 hours. 

I'm not disagreeing, but calling it a lower bound when the definition is so broad is funny to me.

As for people online right now, it's hard to know how many of those 300,000 will never come back again, the perpetual revolving door of curious beginners and non-players happy.png

And I'm sure there's some pareto principle involved here where 80% of the games come from 20% of the players sort of thing.

llama36
Martin_Stahl wrote:

Heck, by your definition, I don't think I would qualify as active

Me either, and I log in every day.

woton
Martin_Stahl wrote:
woton wrote:

If it's really important to you, the link that I gave earlier provides rating distribution curves.  You can add up the number of players at each rating interval.  I did it for Rapid, and it came to about 13.5 million, which is consistent with my earlier calculation.  

 

The leaderboard has the total listed.

 

The problem is that the 26 million is not consistent with other data.  If my rank is 350000 and there are 26 million active Rapid members, my percentile would be 98.7, not 97.3 (Note that the Leaderboard says players, not active players.  Are we talking about two different number?).  Also, when I add the increments in the distribution curve, I get 13 million.

If I go by the data in the Leaderboards, there are about 45 million active members (out of 90 million total members).  I think that the number is about 25 million.  Anyhow, we now have a range.

Martin_Stahl
woton wrote:

The problem is that the 26 million is not consistent with other data.  If my rank is 350000 and there are 26 million active Rapid members, my percentile would be 98.7, not 97.3 (Note that the Leaderboard says players, not active players.  Are we talking about two different number?).  Also, when I add the increments in the distribution curve, I get 13 million.

If I go by the data in the Leaderboards, there are about 45 million active members (out of 90 million total members).  I think that the number is about 25 million.  Anyhow, we now have a range.

 

More than one person has the same rating as you do and are in your percentile group.

 

To get a percentile value you have to have at least 29 games in a pool in the last 90 days and I'm pretty sure that to show on the Leaderboards that is also required.

woton

Here are the numbers that I obtained from the distribution curve

Rating Range                    Number of Players, millions

100-600                                  4.85

600-1100                                 6.66

1100-1700                               2.72

1700+                                        Not counted (small in comparison)

                               Total         14.23 

Although I may have the same rating as others, we will have different rankings*, and because of round offs, a few of us, but not many, will have the same percentile.  However, I don't think that would account for a 12 million difference in the total. 

*See https://www.chess.com/leaderboard/live/rapid?page=1500 for an example.

Haebel_Ebby

According to my rating, I just crossed 99 percentile in rapid and my rank is like #171071, so I guess total active members would be like 17 million 

woton
artigas183 wrote:
Depends if you account for all the false accounts being created with 1 day old

I don't know what you mean by "false accounts," but the definition of active players is that they have played at least one game in the last 90 days.

C0ZM0_0
Ziryab wrote:
donkey wrote:
NervesofButter wrote:

You need to define active.

played a game in the last 90 days

I consider myself inactive if I miss a week.

Kinda...lol

Ziryab

There are six active members here. The rest of us come and go.

Wits-end
Ziryab wrote:

There are six active members here. The rest of us come and go.

Sure , but how many reactive members are there?

Ziryab
Wits-end wrote:
Ziryab wrote:

There are six active members here. The rest of us come and go.

Sure , but how many reactive members are there?

Everyone posting in the forums.

Drummer_GD_Elijah

Bump

Drummer_GD_Elijah

pmuB

HangingPiecesChomper

maybe 1000 at most

Drummer_GD_Elijah
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:

maybe 1000 at most

cap

Drummer_GD_Elijah

millions

HangingPiecesChomper
Drummer_GD_Elijah wrote:
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:

maybe 1000 at most

cap

i suspect most "players" on this site are actually bad bots. I've seen some "titled" players hang pieces like crazy.

Drummer_GD_Elijah
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
Drummer_GD_Elijah wrote:
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:

maybe 1000 at most

cap

i suspect most "players" on this site are actually bad bots. I've seen some "titled" players hang pieces like crazy.

It's true there's lots of bots on this site. As for titled players hanging pieces, idk what to tell you, probably misclicks?