If Chess is real, why are there letters and numbers on the board?
Positions were formerly named very verbosely relative to the player--King's file, third rank. Is that e3 or e6?

@NotAUniqueUserName this is an interesting factor. Does the humanization of the pieces being less commonly used, take away Chess's place as a reality? Using letter and number notations may challenge this.

Jalex13 is asking a secondary question that impugns the implication's connection with your claim. If numbers and letters do NOT influence whether it's a reality, then whether or not there are numbers or letters is irrelevant, which makes the question in the title meaningless.

There are numbers and letters in the so-called "real world", are there not?
Thus I refute the concept of "reality".

Jalex13 is asking a secondary question that impugns the implication's connection with your claim. If numbers and letters do NOT influence whether it's a reality, then whether or not there are numbers or letters is irrelevant, which makes the question in the title meaningless.
This is not a claim, but rather a question raised. Jalex13 was asking a question in response to my question, while being under the assumption it was a claim. The question is not meaningless, but rather a discussion that has spouted discussion.

There are numbers and letters in the so-called "real world", are there not?
Thus I refute the concept of "reality".
You refute the idea of chess being real, or refute the idea of a reality where the numbers and letters influence chess?

There are numbers and letters in the so-called "real world", are there not?
Thus I refute the concept of "reality".
You refute the idea of chess being real, or refute the idea of a reality where the numbers and letters influence chess?
Reality itself lies crushed and broken at the feet of my inescapable logic.
discuss