If Fischer had had a normal personality type, would we remember him today?

Sort:
orangehonda
trysts wrote:
crogers wrote:

 Perhaps if he had never pursued the anticlimactic rematch with Spassky and had never turned against our nation, chess would still be the revered televised sport it was in Fischer's glory days.


Fischer had every right to play Spassky in '92. The American government were in the wrong persuing Fischer after that match. The government allowed American companies to negotiate, trade, profit, and basically "play" in a country banned by Congress. Total BS that Fischer could not play a bloody chess match with Spassky there. The whole story on that injustice is waiting to be written, for sure.

Fischer, also, turned against the American government, not as you put it "our nation", as if there is such a thing. Clearly he had problems, justified in some cases, with American history being some silly beacon of hope and freedom. It's not. He was pissed about it, and he started spewing a bunch of idiotic blame on Jew-controlled this, and Jew-controlled that. Probably the most used scape-goat in the history of Christian-leaning thinking.

As far as your bizarre "revered televised sport", I have NO idea where you got that claim from. The candidates matches, and the championship match were reported vigorously, and broadcast as American propaganda: The U.S./U.S.S.R. battle for the press. Fischer was so naive to American propaganda in the 60's and early 70's, that he had no clue he was merely a pawn in a propaganda game. Probably finding out later about this, added to him being pretty pissed off about the illusion of America.


What's this?  A thought out and sensible post in a place like this?  Amazing.

Conflagration_Planet
electricpawn wrote:

If Fischer had a normal personality, would he be remebered? If Fischer had a normal personality, would he have been a chess player? What if you put Fischer's brain in Arnold Scharzenegger's body? What then? What if Fischer had been a house cat that retained the human Fischer's ability to play chess? Would they let the cat play in tournaments? What if Fischer had a sex change operation? Would he have united the male and female championship? Would they have given him/her a belt for each title like they do in boxing? What if Fischer and Karpov had been gay lovers? Would Fischer have played him for the title then? How awkward would it have been? What would have happened if Fischer could fly like Superman?


What if we discover that Reb is right, and he really COULD walk on water? 

Spiffe
trysts wrote:
Fischer, also, turned against the American government, not as you put it "our nation", as if there is such a thing.

I've had enough discussion of Fischer to last me several lifetimes, but let's set the record straight on this nonsense.  Anyone who applauded 9/11 clearly is not making a distinction between the American government and its people.

Conflagration_Planet
Spiffe wrote:
trysts wrote:
Fischer, also, turned against the American government, not as you put it "our nation", as if there is such a thing.

I've had enough discussion of Fischer to last me several lifetimes, but let's set the record straight on this nonsense.  Anyone who applauded 9/11 clearly is not making a distinction between the American government and its people.


 They also prove themselves to be an irrational nut job.

theoreticalboy

Expanding on electricpawn's point; if Fischer was a feline, would he have to claw his notation directly into the table he played at, or would he be allowed to have someone else record his moves?

Another important point; if he was an international superstar DJ, would you breakdance to his fire beats?

And, is there some sort of formula to determine when Reb will come into this thread and post "Stop the Hate"?

William_Smitham

    I found it an interesting side note that the two greatest American chess players in many people's eyes (Paul Morphy and Bobby Fischer) seemed to have lost their hold on sanity after reaching the top of their chess careers.  It might be argued that it was because of their personalities, the bad as well as the good, that they were able to become the great chess players that they were.  If that is the case we might not be talking about Mr. Fischer at all if he were more "normal," for lack of a better word on my behalf.

     It would be hard for one to argue that Fischer's chess play itself was lacking in some way.  When he played he appears to have been a very dominating player.  After taking the chess world by storm at the beginning of his career, he took a break from the game.  After this break he returned refreshed and played brilliantly; his play eventually making him World Champion.  Then, Mr. Fischer walked away from the game; refusing to defend his title and losing it to Mr. Karpov.  I personally feel that this lack of consistancy hurts his status as a complete chess player.  If this same inconsistancy was produced by another player I think it would limit their status.

     The sporatic play of Bobby's career is a direct result of his character traits.  While these traits hurt his status as a complete chess player, they did make him a complete chess personality!  His mystique will continue to exist for the current chess world because of all of the "what if" and "what happened" scenarios that he himself created with his actions and ideas.  In his career through the middle of the 1970's, he brought about controversies in the chess world that were fueled by the cold war atmosphere; as well as many of his personal demands that many at the time considered strange; making him a rebellious character.  He was, in his prime, a unique personality that brought a different image to chess at the top level.  His late reappearance after his prime brought about controversies outside of the realm of chess, adding to his mystique more questions about the man "who should have" as well as more "what happened" questions.

     His character also allowed him to stand out in contrast to Soviet chess.  For a large portion of the 20th century the Soviet chess machine dominated the game (before as well as after Fischer's championship).  In many ways he was the opposite in expression compared to his Russian competition.  His loner image was in direct contrast to the image of the U.S.S.R.'s stable of top players.  His personal demands clashed with the conformity presented by Soviet players.  Even his approach to the game was in contrast to the Russian approach at times.  And because of his status as the only non-Soviet champion for years before as well as after his climb to the top; he represented the only real alternative to the chess machine that the U.S.S.R. created in the 20th century.

     So, my personal take on the topic is that we would not remember Bobby Fischer in the same way if he had a more "normal" personality type. 

trysts
Spiffe wrote:
trysts wrote:
Fischer, also, turned against the American government, not as you put it "our nation", as if there is such a thing.

I've had enough discussion of Fischer to last me several lifetimes, but let's set the record straight on this nonsense.  Anyone who applauded 9/11 clearly is not making a distinction between the American government and its people.


What "nonsense" are you talking about? I was saying "our nation" doesn't really exist. That's just silly. Fischer definitely did not think "our nation" existed because he said it was "illegitimate". He said it belonged to the Native Americans. When 911 occurred, Fischer was more than pleased about "blowback" for all the crimes the U.S. government committed around the world, and throughout history as he saw it, and he was quite happy about it happening in New York--"Where the Jews are."

I didn't make any distinction between Americans, and their government in the above quote, as Fischer did not give any indication either way, that there is a seperation, or not. But he constantly ranted about the "U.S. government", "The Jew-controlled government", "Those phony politicians in Washington", etc., etc. When he said, "America needs a lesson." He could have been talking about everyone here, or he could have been talking about the "Jews", who have, "infected America". He wasn't clear on the matter in the hours of tapes I listened to, and pages of transcripts I read. Fischer wasn't very consistent with his thinking, other than the puerile Jew claims. Apart from chess, not a bright guy at all, IMO.

On a curious note, there is video and eye-witness reports of a van-load of Israeli Nationals cheering, applauding, and video-taping the planes hitting the towers on 911. I haven't really looked into it much, but it is a curiosity you could google...

electricpawn
woodshover wrote:
electricpawn wrote:

If Fischer had a normal personality, would he be remebered? If Fischer had a normal personality, would he have been a chess player? What if you put Fischer's brain in Arnold Scharzenegger's body? What then? What if Fischer had been a house cat that retained the human Fischer's ability to play chess? Would they let the cat play in tournaments? What if Fischer had a sex change operation? Would he have united the male and female championship? Would they have given him/her a belt for each title like they do in boxing? What if Fischer and Karpov had been gay lovers? Would Fischer have played him for the title then? How awkward would it have been? What would have happened if Fischer could fly like Superman?


What if we discover that Reb is right, and he really COULD walk on water? 


 Fischer wouldn't like that. Jesus was a Jew!

electricpawn
theoreticalboy wrote:

Expanding on electricpawn's point; if Fischer was a feline, would he have to claw his notation directly into the table he played at, or would he be allowed to have someone else record his moves?

Another important point; if he was an international superstar DJ, would you breakdance to his fire beats?

And, is there some sort of formula to determine when Reb will come into this thread and post "Stop the Hate"?


 Claw's probably best. Paw prints would be messy and cumbersome. If Bobby Fischer was a cook at IHOP, do you think he'd get more orders for pancakes or waffles?

INACTIVE_Radrook

We would, since he caused an uproar with his defeat of one grandmaster after another in order win a chance at the title. However, his weird personality made it harder for us to forget who did it. He also dispelled the intelligence aura from the game and made it quite clear that even the mentally unstable person can become a grandmaster and that the fabled inseparable link between general high intelligence and chess proficiency is bogus.

Eo____
trysts wrote:
crogers wrote:

 Perhaps if he had never pursued the anticlimactic rematch with Spassky and had never turned against our nation, chess would still be the revered televised sport it was in Fischer's glory days.


Fischer had every right to play Spassky in '92. The American government were in the wrong persuing Fischer after that match. The government allowed American companies to negotiate, trade, profit, and basically "play" in a country banned by Congress. Total BS that Fischer could not play a bloody chess match with Spassky there. The whole story on that injustice is waiting to be written, for sure.


If Fischer had explained to the people who invited him to play Spassky in Yugolasvia that the US government did not allow him to play in that country, don't you guys think that those people would have understood Fischer's position and set the event in another country? Possibly, but Fischer had an ego the size of the universe and would not accept "no" from the people who according to him owed him a great deal of gratitude. Fischer went into a hell of his own making the moment he decided to make the US government his enemy, and the sad part is that in his own masochistic way he probably enjoyed being there.

trysts
Eo____ wrote:
trysts wrote:
crogers wrote:

 Perhaps if he had never pursued the anticlimactic rematch with Spassky and had never turned against our nation, chess would still be the revered televised sport it was in Fischer's glory days.


Fischer had every right to play Spassky in '92. The American government were in the wrong persuing Fischer after that match. The government allowed American companies to negotiate, trade, profit, and basically "play" in a country banned by Congress. Total BS that Fischer could not play a bloody chess match with Spassky there. The whole story on that injustice is waiting to be written, for sure.


If Fischer had explained to the people who invited him to play Spassky in Yugolasvia that the US government did not allow him to play in that country, don't you guys think that the people organizing the event would have understood Fischer's position and set the event in another country?


It wasn't a secret.

orangehonda
trysts wrote:
Eo____ wrote:
trysts wrote:
crogers wrote:

 Perhaps if he had never pursued the anticlimactic rematch with Spassky and had never turned against our nation, chess would still be the revered televised sport it was in Fischer's glory days.


Fischer had every right to play Spassky in '92. The American government were in the wrong persuing Fischer after that match. The government allowed American companies to negotiate, trade, profit, and basically "play" in a country banned by Congress. Total BS that Fischer could not play a bloody chess match with Spassky there. The whole story on that injustice is waiting to be written, for sure.


If Fischer had explained to the people who invited him to play Spassky in Yugolasvia that the US government did not allow him to play in that country, don't you guys think that the people organizing the event would have understood Fischer's position and set the event in another country?


It wasn't a secret.


In fact it was the opposite.  What's a good word?  Forthright, transparent, clear, public, explicit, common knowledge, obvious, disclosed, candid, overt, plain to see, evident... not strong enough... need a word like famous... famous information... eminent, that's a good one, the information wasn't secret, it was eminent information Tongue out

For those that weren't clear on the position of the US, and how Fischer felt about it, he held a press conference and spit on the letter telling him (Fischer) not to play there.

Eo____
Radrook wrote:

 He also dispelled the intelligence aura from the game and made it quite clear that even the mentally unstable person can become a grandmaster and that the fabled inseparable link between general high intelligence and chess proficiency is bogus.


Your conclusion is incorrect. If anything, Fischer proved that mental health and intelligence don't always go hand in hand. Only ignorants believe that crazy = stupid. For the record, Fischer was reported to have an IQ of around 180.

fissionfowl
tonydal wrote:
westy1 wrote:
rab63 wrote:

yes the type of person he is/or was has nothing to do with his skill over the board


Yeah, he'd still be considered one of the greatest. But I do think there is some basis to suggest his status may not have become so mythical. People seem to be fascinated with individuals who are a bit "strange" or who's lives have something out of the ordinary connected to it. For instance in music dying young seems to be a guarantee for a lot of artists of becoming legendary...


That's true.  On the other hand, Garri wasn't nuts (though still crazy enough to go into Russian politics :) ), yet his legendary status seems assured.


Yeah, I wasn't saying no one can become a legend without being crazy. Smile

WhiteKnight56
Eo____ wrote:

If Fischer had had a normal personality type and hadn't been so eccentric, many of us probably would still remember him as the first American World Chess Champion after Paul Morphy, but would we elevate him to the level of a Chess titan or just regard him as another World Chess Champion who came and went?


I once read an article which said how tragic it was that Beethoven had died of cirrhosis of the liver, and how many symphonies did we lose because of his alcoholism?  My immediate reaction was to think "No, the quesion should be 'How many symphonies would he have written if he'd never taken a drink?'"

I feel the same about Fischer.  If he hadn't had that mad streak in him, who knows whether he'd even have bothered with chess at all?

Thank God for Fischer and Beethoven, craziness, drunkenness and all!

TheOldReb

           S T O P    T H E    H A T E !

TheOldReb
trysts wrote:

I don't have a clue what a "normal personality" is. But, he probably would be revered by more people if he held his arrogance in check during interviews, and he probably would not have been so mean-spirited about the jews(I mean wanting them slaughtered), if he hadn't gotten so involved with Jesus-stuff.


 Blame it on the Christians and the " Jesus Stuff " eh trysts !?  LOL  Tell me, do you hate them more than hunters ? What about a christian who also hunts ?

I think Fischer's feelings soured towards jews due to his personal dealings with many of them more than with the "jesus stuff " myself but maybe thats just me ?

TheOldReb
orangehonda wrote:

Of course not, the first you think of when someone mentions Fischer is "crazy person" and only after a while (if at all) do you remember "chess champion"  Also most serious players could hardly name 4 world champions... people just don't remember this stuff.

Wait, no, I have that backwards, never mind it was a dumb question after all.

Welcome back Eo____


 A person who couldnt name a measley 4 world chess champions is NOT a serious chess player/fan in my book. I mean.. almost everyone can name Fischer and Spassky and then the rivalry between Kasparov/Karpov ....... just those are 4 ....

Cipherz

There are quite a few openings and variations that have been named after people who have been WC one time or another. How do you not know only four WC and "seriously" play chess!?!?!