Illegal League Strategy?

Sort:
llama47

Well it finally happened. Someone is making good use of this strategy.

I was told that "technically" playing simuls is against the rules (even though chess.com fails to mention it in the rules).

One reason to make a rule against simuls is that only premium members can play multiple games at once... one reason to not put it in their rules is they have no idea how to stop people from doing it.

This guy is currently #1 on the crystal leaderboard
@marks1420

I checked his last 20 games. He played 20 games of rapid in a little over 1 hour... so it's roughly at the pace of 2|0 games, except rapid gives 5x as many trophies.

LeeEuler

There is a lot to be desired about the rules for leagues. One that bothers me is that it actively discourages improvement (if you play your 10|0 games like bullet games, then I don't think clock management could be considered sandbagging, and now instead of winning ~50% of your games in 20 mins, you are winning ~50% of your games in say 5 mins as your rating stabilizes at a lower rating). Even ignoring things like that, there is no benefit at all to improving seeing as the only goal is to play often, and playing often is easier when you are expending little energy on your games.

 

To your point-- is playing simuls actually against the rules of the leagues or is it just frowned upon? 

llama47
LeeEuler wrote:

To your point-- is playing simuls actually against the rules of the leagues or is it just frowned upon? 

I asked a mod.

The mod told me they asked a staff member who said it's not allowed.

But it's not in the rules and people have been doing it for a few weeks so...

llama47
LeeEuler wrote:

There is a lot to be desired about the rules for leagues.

I agree.

 

LeeEuler wrote:

One that bothers me is that it actively discourages improvement

I mean... I don't really care about that.

Maybe I'm too old to know what "leagues" implies. Maybe most people see it as a ranking system (like in most games) so it annoys them that leagues on chess.com is not a representation of skill.

DefenderPug2

How do you quote two at the same time…..

llama47
DefenderPug2 wrote:

How 

DefenderPug2 wrote:

do

DefenderPug2 wrote:

you

DefenderPug2 wrote:

do

Copy and paste.

Ilampozhil25
llama47 wrote:
LeeEuler wrote:

There is a lot to be desired about the rules for leagues.

I agree.

 

LeeEuler wrote:

One that bothers me is that it actively discourages improvement

I mean... I don't really care about that.

Maybe I'm too old to know what "leagues" implies. Maybe most people see it as a ranking system (like in most games) so it annoys them that leagues on chess.com is not a representation of skill.

i think it usually is just a system to keep us playing for long 

NikkiLikeChikki

Leagues are absolutely not a representation of skill, it's a representation of how much of a mindless automaton you can be. And yes, it's just a system to get people to play a lot. Marketing studies in games like Fortnite have shown that the more people play, the more they are likely to buy extras. If you play a lot, you're more likely to wonder what your accuracy was for all of those games or you're more likely to get sick of ads or something. The prize fund is $50,000. A diamond membership is $100. That means if they get 500 extra people to buy diamond, it's paid for (it's actually much fewer since prizes are a business expense for tax purposes).

They don't want it to be about skill. If it were about skill, not everyone would be incentivized to play a lot. They want  you grinding like a robot so that you'll eventually break down and buy something. The league rating is just a false rating designed to keep you hooked and spending. That's all.

llama47

Yeah, that seems to be a common complaint, but I don't really mind. I had fun playing for a few weeks. Now I'm not playing again. No harm and a little fun as far as my experience went.

nTzT

His rating dropped 500 also... These trophy things are pure grind. Sadly kinda lame.

NikkiLikeChikki

Llama - the system has been called "manufactured discontent." They create a system that when you play it, you become unhappy and annoyed about certain aspects of it, and the only way to fix it is to spend money. I'm playing! It's great! But jeez I'm annoyed that I can't check my accuracy that game. Jeez I'm annoyed by all of these ads. Jeez I'm annoyed that I keep losing to the London System. Aww man! That girl has a palm tree next to her name and I don't! That little cartoon guys says he can fix my game. Jeez I'm annoyed that I can't fix my game. Well crap, I'll spend some money. Phew.

I'm just waiting for the day when they start selling emotes that you can flash before and after the game. Chess is a bit lucky because such things would be more frowned upon because of a tradition of seriousness, but don't think that there aren't people in the marketing department trying to figure out more things that you can buy. But the minute they sell an emote of some dude flexing his muscles after the game, I'm outta here.

Alena_str
I don’t understand why some people have already in crystal league. I thought the league began at the same time for all. I’m in a stone league.
llama47
Alena_str wrote:
I don’t understand why some people have already in crystal league. I thought the league began at the same time for all. I’m in a stone league.

Maybe you were playing in "live" instead of "play"? Or maybe you're unsure of how they work?

https://www.chess.com/news/view/chesscom-releases-leagues

Lord_Hammer
llama47 wrote:
DefenderPug2 wrote:

How 

DefenderPug2 wrote:

do

DefenderPug2 wrote:

you

DefenderPug2 wrote:

do

Copy and paste.

When I last tried a few weeks ago, it didn't work anymore. I'll have to try again later and see if it does tongue.png 

NikkiLikeChikki

You absolutely do not have to win most of them. Winning is pretty much a myth. The rating system ensures that unless you're at the very very top or the very very bottom, your rating will always hover around 50%. If you win games, your rating goes up, you play harder opponents, you lose. Look up the win percentages of all of your friends and you'll see that unless they are a super GM or a complete novice, it'll be right around 50%.

Alena_str

Maybe you were playing in "live" instead of "play"? I read your link Thank you for it. Is there any difference between playing in arena tournaments or just playing games? I always take part in arena tournaments, but I'm in a stone league. I think maybe it's because my league began in January. I saw some people began playing in December. It means that who is in a stone league now won't get anything in any case?

nTzT
edot12345 wrote:

yes, but u still have to win most of them :0

You don't. You can actually resign or lose a ton so you can win the other games easier and quicker. Lots of scummy type things that can be done.

AlCzervik
Lord_Hammer wrote:
llama47 wrote:
DefenderPug2 wrote:

How 

DefenderPug2 wrote:

do

DefenderPug2 wrote:

you

DefenderPug2 wrote:

do

Copy and paste.

When I last tried a few weeks ago, it didn't work anymore. I'll have to try again later and see if it does  

i have problems with this, also. i wonder if you have to quote, then copy/paste, and if there is a different post you need to do the same thing. that would require two open windows of cc.

llama47

I'm on windows 10 chrome.

I click the quote button.

I click anywhere in the message box.

While holding in the control button I press a, x, then v.

I delete the parts of the quote I don't want and then type a response.

I press control + v

I delete the parts of the quote I don't want and then type a response.

I press control + v

etc.

Opening a quote multiple times in multiple tabs and copy - pasting from there would also work.

llama47
NikkiLikeChikki wrote:

Llama - the system has been called "manufactured discontent." They create a system that when you play it, you become unhappy and annoyed about certain aspects of it, and the only way to fix it is to spend money. I'm playing! It's great! But jeez I'm annoyed that I can't check my accuracy that game. Jeez I'm annoyed by all of these ads. Jeez I'm annoyed that I keep losing to the London System. Aww man! That girl has a palm tree next to her name and I don't! That little cartoon guys says he can fix my game. Jeez I'm annoyed that I can't fix my game. Well crap, I'll spend some money. Phew.

I'm just waiting for the day when they start selling emotes that you can flash before and after the game. Chess is a bit lucky because such things would be more frowned upon because of a tradition of seriousness, but don't think that there aren't people in the marketing department trying to figure out more things that you can buy. But the minute they sell an emote of some dude flexing his muscles after the game, I'm outta here.

I don't care about them making money. My two main complaints are:

1) The rules are inconsistent. They adjusted trophies by time control but they failed to do the same for arena (bullet arena earns more trophies than other arenas).

2) My 2nd hand information is that simuls are not allowed, yet this is not in the rules and people are doing it.

---

I also have doubts in their ability to prevent certain types of rule breaking / bending, but I guess this kind of competition is never perfect.