Question

Sort:
Oldest
PleasantonCalifornia

Was it harder to go from 1500 to 2000 then it was to go from under 1000 to a 1500 rating?

Goyael

1500 to 2000 is harder because it is easier to have 1000 rating than 1500

blueemu

You can get from 1000 to 1500 just by reducing the number of blunders you make. 

Getting up to 2000 requires a bit more understanding than that.

eric0022
ScottNoCa wrote:

Question for those who know.  Is it harder to go from 1500 to 2000 then it was to go from under 1000 to a 1500 rating?

 

It is similar to improving from 0 to 20 marks versus 80 marks to 100 marks in an examination.

ArielDiRay
ScottNoCa wrote:

Question for those who know.  Is it harder to go from 1500 to 2000 then it was to go from under 1000 to a 1500 rating?

You should be able to defeat me first

ArielDiRay

I am the best chess player in the world, I accept challenges, are there any brave ones?angry.png

Aqil_Idraki

Me

Aqil_Idraki
ArielDiRay wrote:

I am the best chess player in the world, I accept challenges, are there any brave ones?

How about I challenge you

tygxc

The closer you get to your personal ceiling, the harder it gets.
1000 to 1500 is about preventing blunders
1500 to 2000 is about tactics
2000 to 2500 is about endgames
> 2500 is about openings

blueemu
tygxc wrote:

The closer you get to your personal ceiling, the harder it gets.
1000 to 1500 is about preventing blunders
1500 to 2000 is about tactics
2000 to 2500 is about endgames
> 2500 is about openings

Good list, but I'm 2350 and it's still mostly tactics.

eric0022
blueemu wrote:
tygxc wrote:

The closer you get to your personal ceiling, the harder it gets.
1000 to 1500 is about preventing blunders
1500 to 2000 is about tactics
2000 to 2500 is about endgames
> 2500 is about openings

Good list, but I'm 2350 and it's still mostly tactics.

 

Even at my level, it's still preventing blunders.

DreamscapeHorizons

 

Like the old saying goes....... the first million is the hardest. 

YourBiologicalDad
1500-2000 is harder because of something called the learning curve.
blueemu
YourBiologicalDad wrote:
1500-2000 is harder because of something called the learning curve.

Oh, yeah... that bendy educational thing...

llama47
tygxc wrote:

The closer you get to your personal ceiling, the harder it gets.
1000 to 1500 is about preventing blunders
1500 to 2000 is about tactics
2000 to 2500 is about endgames
> 2500 is about openings

No strategy then?

tongue.png

llama47
ScottNoCa wrote:

Is it harder to go from 1500 to 2000 than beginner to 1500?

Obviously yes.

Anonymous_Dragon
llama47 wrote:
tygxc wrote:

The closer you get to your personal ceiling, the harder it gets.
1000 to 1500 is about preventing blunders
1500 to 2000 is about tactics
2000 to 2500 is about endgames
> 2500 is about openings

No strategy then?

 

Strategy is for the dumb peeps . Chess is all about raw calculation

pdve
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
llama47 wrote:
tygxc wrote:

The closer you get to your personal ceiling, the harder it gets.
1000 to 1500 is about preventing blunders
1500 to 2000 is about tactics
2000 to 2500 is about endgames
> 2500 is about openings

No strategy then?

 

Strategy is for the dumb peeps . Chess is all about raw calculation

 

Nothing is farther from the truth. It depends on the nature of the position.

AStronaut4557
tygxc wrote:

The closer you get to your personal ceiling, the harder it gets.
1000 to 1500 is about preventing blunders
1500 to 2000 is about tactics
2000 to 2500 is about endgames
> 2500 is about openings

Also depends on time control. In a long game positional chess is way more important anything else.

JuergenWerner
tygxc wrote:

The closer you get to your personal ceiling, the harder it gets.
1000 to 1500 is about preventing blunders
1500 to 2000 is about tactics
2000 to 2500 is about endgames
> 2500 is about openings

 

LOL @ the last line. If this is true then just study openings