there is plenty examples where opposite bishops isn't a draw
http://www.chess.com/article/view/opposite-colored-bishops2
from article
"At this stage opposite-colored bishops are often a sign of a draw. Sometimes even being a few pawns up may not be enough for a win since the weaker side may build a fortress. However, my experience from watching online broadcasts from tournaments (or commentating myself) shows that people often overestimate this concept and are eager to announce “a dead draw” in ANY opposite-color bishop position, which is not the case."
When you come to a position that is clearly drawn, and neither side has any clear way to make progress barring an absolute blunder by your opponent. Opposite bishops being a good example.
If from a position as I mentioned above you shuffle and shuffle and shuffle your pieces around just waiting for a blunder beyond 50 moves b/c you save a fruitless pawn move or 2, and your opponent don't budge at all... and you make what should be like a 40-50 move draw by agreement... declining 10+ draw offers through out the game... turning it into a 180+ move draw b/c of the 50 move rule...
Are you just being unsportsmanlike or what? Is there another word for it? Is this an ok strategy? b/c The impossible hard computer has done this to me on numerous draws and it is sooooooooooo annoying