Is the Evans Gambit next?

Sort:
TheChessAnalyst

For about the last 4-6 months I have been playing 1.e4 with a focus on:

a) developing all my peices to active squares.

b) castling quickly

c) connecting the rooks

d)creating a threat on every move

e) limited pawn moves to maintain structure

 

Ok works well and I find myself in the Italian Game or a 2 knights game more than anything - probably my level - not alot of Sicilian players down here.

I was thinking that I want to have something a little fresh in my reprotore and the evans gambit seems to be a nice fit -

A) arrives from the same sequence of moves.

b) not a lot of therory

c) stays with cut and thrust ideas behind the open games.

 

How does the evans gambit fit into a young 1550 rated players open game reprotore - is it sound - and is there any good resources one could recommend - other than GM games (just to get the basic ideas, not a move order reference.

 

Thanks

AdmiralPicard

Evans gambit is fun and all, but it's one of the few gambits i believe lower rated players shouldn't really play it aside from blitz that is. For most variants, you either have to be incredibly sharp to preciselly force and punish any mistake from the opponent in order to get something for the 2 pawns sacrificed, or against refuted variants, you'll have to be quite a good positional player to get the win after you get the pawn back.

The best advice i can give you about the opening is that it's all about controlling the centre and straight forward focus attack on f7, while trying to prevent castling with possible Ba3 or Bb2. Black best answers include d6, or maneuvre Ba5 -> Bb6, Be7 or Qe7 and d5, and little more, which kind of take the the initiative out of white .

On the positional side, there's also the possibility of a4+b4 for white which might pressure knight and bishop as well as control the queen side while focusing on attacking the king side.

Aside of all this, i actually use it for fun in blitz, and i must say that i don't really have much success with it often because if black nullifies the tempo you'll mostly just be a pawn down.

Jenium

I think the Evans it's a fun opening. It plays itself and works well against players U1600 who don't know the traps and ideas. So why not.

I decided to trash it though because stronger players (1800+) will grab the pawn consolidate and let you prove that you have compensation.

TheChessAnalyst

Wow, I haven't posted in this topic in a long time --- I gave up the Evens Gambit shortly after playing it a while. I simply did not enjoy the positions very much - I hated that my Queen side pawns where all tore up.

 

I have been playing the Vienna Gambit with great success, and it is a very fun opening. The bonus is that your queen side pawns stay intact so that you can still have a good chance in an end game.

 

TCA

GrizliMan

I am playing Evans gambit a lot.Verry big succes i have with him aginst 1400+,1600 and few times with 1800+ but on real board not here on site because you have option to click on explorer and check what is best move so you can not get into trap that easy.For example i won 5 games totaly on board against 1400+ and 1600+ players in 14 moves and here on chess .com i have 1 win and 7 lost against evans gambit.why? again explorer so give it a try.i dont like to attack but i love evans gambit.

penandpaper0089
Jenium wrote:

I think the Evans it's a fun opening. It plays itself and works well against players U1600 who don't know the traps and ideas. So why not.

I decided to trash it though because stronger players (1800+) will grab the pawn consolidate and let you prove that you have compensation.

That's what's so good about it. It's sound but you have to get better to really get the best out of it. Most gambits are only usable for a while but this is one of the few you could probably play forever. 

KevinTheSnipe

Kasparov has played it, against Anand if I recall. he also won, not sure how easily Anand equalized, if at all. There was a 2100 player at my club that mowed down a 2000 player in like 20 moves. So I think it's flawed to say "it's only playable under x rating." I saw a Seirawan video on YouTube and he mentioned offhand that the reason the gambit isn't more played at high level is because of black's easy equality in the declined line, and not the accepted lines where white gets adequate compensation and interesting play for the pawn.

KevinTheSnipe

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1018648, Anand went down in 25 moves.

skullyvick

I would play the Evans Gambit too. Check out Fischer's masterpiece with the Evans.

In any case you'll learn what to do should you play blacks and your opponent throws the Evans at you.