Is there a database of players under 200?

Sort:
Oldest
AHHHHHHGH

Im doing a project on who wins more, white or black. I obviously put white as the overall victor but I need to include some variables that may prove my hypothesis (like the rating, time alloted to each player or if the person is using a computer or cheating). So far I have a bit of data but I kind of want a database of bad players too so i can see if it correlates into the lower ranks (like me) or if it doesent matter.  Most of my reasearch leads me to believe that it doesent make as much of a difference the lower the elo because they hang their queen every 5 moves (like me again) but i need statistical data to prove my point.

perimeter3

browse the members and when you encounter one, look at their history. There are many under 200

eric0022
AHHHHHHGH wrote:

...because they hang their queen every 5 moves...

 

Does this mean that you successfully promoted your pawns to queens and got the queens captured on moves 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 and 45 in a single game?

AHHHHHHGH

i need like hudreds of thousands of games (also i just realized i put a typo, i put 200 not 2000 sad.png)

 

 

BpK0

You can filter games on lichess by strength

EscherehcsE
AHHHHHHGH wrote:

Im doing a project on who wins more, white or black. I obviously put white as the overall victor but I need to include some variables that may prove my hypothesis (like the rating, time alloted to each player or if the person is using a computer or cheating). So far I have a bit of data but I kind of want a database of bad players too so i can see if it correlates into the lower ranks (like me) or if it doesent matter.  Most of my reasearch leads me to believe that it doesent make as much of a difference the lower the elo because they hang their queen every 5 moves (like me again) but i need statistical data to prove my point.

It's kind of been done before, but if you want to do it again, that's cool...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-move_advantage_in_chess

DrSpudnik

I think it's called The Hall of Shame.

DrSpudnik

An opening book of horrible games! Genius!!! A first!

binomine
AHHHHHHGH wrote:

Im doing a project on who wins more, white or black. I obviously put white as the overall victor but I need to include some variables that may prove my hypothesis (like the rating, time alloted to each player or if the person is using a computer or cheating). So far I have a bit of data but I kind of want a database of bad players too so i can see if it correlates into the lower ranks (like me) or if it doesent matter.  Most of my reasearch leads me to believe that it doesent make as much of a difference the lower the elo because they hang their queen every 5 moves (like me again) but i need statistical data to prove my point.

You can download all games from lichess.org, and then filter your results based on ratings.  You are going to find that you have two humps in your data, though, because there are a lot of smurfs in the <300 category you are going to need to filter out. 

1e4c6_O-1
AHHHHHHGH wrote:

i need like hudreds of thousands of games (also i just realized i put a typo, i put 200 not 2000 )

That's a big difference.

DejaDeJugarBlitz

You can ask chess com for that data, obviously they have it and they could give it to you, as well as ask lichess for data.
I suppose that if it is for an investigation they will agree, but it is also probable that you don't even have to investigate and they have already had all that analyzed for a long time.

AHHHHHHGH
EscherehcsE wrote:
AHHHHHHGH wrote:

Im doing a project on who wins more, white or black. I obviously put white as the overall victor but I need to include some variables that may prove my hypothesis (like the rating, time alloted to each player or if the person is using a computer or cheating). So far I have a bit of data but I kind of want a database of bad players too so i can see if it correlates into the lower ranks (like me) or if it doesent matter.  Most of my reasearch leads me to believe that it doesent make as much of a difference the lower the elo because they hang their queen every 5 moves (like me again) but i need statistical data to prove my point.

It's kind of been done before, but if you want to do it again, that's cool...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-move_advantage_in_chess

thats true but my project relies on me having the adequate data to prove my point and several variables (i.e. what if my opponent is cheating, what if my opponent is a gm, what if my opponent is an 800 player ect)

AHHHHHHGH
DejaDeJugarBlitz wrote:

You can ask chess com for that data, obviously they have it and they could give it to you, as well as ask lichess for data.
I suppose that if it is for an investigation they will agree, but it is also probable that you don't even have to investigate and they have already had all that analyzed for a long time.

how would i go about contacting them? im guessing email lmao 

DejaDeJugarBlitz
AHHHHHHGH wrote:

how would i go about contacting them? im guessing email lmao 

 

Try the send suggestion option.
It's at the bottom left, you leave the pointer on the question mark and several options appear, the suggestion button appears, it's a light bulb.
There is also the trick of sending messages through channels that reach chess com but have nothing to do with it, as an option to report a bug, you just have to ask for a contact and add apologies for using the wrong route, that clever trick worked for me with certain companies of video games.

If none of that works for you, do the task of looking for how to contact them, it could be the support, in any case I think that they themselves leave the information on how to contact them as directly as possible, you just have to read and you will find. I personally never tried to contact lichees or chess com, but once I reported a bug to chess dot com and although it was not necessary they answered me anyway. I think being eloquent matters a lot, because if you're not eloquent and skilled at communicating, you're unlikely to be noticed.

DonThe2nd

Your post made me curious so I separated my wins by color. It turns out I win 5 percent more often with White than I do with Black. Also for some reason I draw more with Black. So for me at least there is a clear advantage having White.

Forums
Forum Legend
Following
New Comments
Locked Topic
Pinned Topic