I've defeated (3200) rating chess.com engine by accident.
Sort:
That's a really weird game. Why would a top engine play that way at move 9 and 10?
The time control was unlimited and I play the challenge which means (no hints) you chess noob
The maximum (3200) engine played like a 1200-1300 rating chess player and I'm a 1400 so It is self explanatory that how I defeated the engine
None of those settings should affect the way the engine plays. That fork at move 10 is not a move a 3200 engine would play.
Even following the engine evaluation lines, they would still be vastly different if it was top Komodo.
Just to put in perspective, didn't Nakamura played Komodo top level on stream a year or so ago? He lost 10-0, it was not even close.
This is clearly not it.
xor_eax_eax05 wrote:
That's a really weird game. Why would a top engine play that way at move 9 and 10?
I know that's weird that a (3200) engine hung a simple rook and king fork at the move 9
xor_eax_eax05 wrote:
None of those settings should affect the way the engine plays. That fork at move 10 is not a move a 3200 engine would play.
Even following the engine evaluation lines, they would still be vastly different if it was top Komodo.
Just to put in perspective, didn't Nakamura played Komodo top level on stream a year or so ago? He lost 10-0, it was not even close.
This is clearly not it.
Yes I agree with you but I don't know what happened to the engine that time, that it play so badly
NervesofButter wrote:
Ah now i see...You can play the 3200 engine, but you can also handicap it.
Ohh a chess noob is saying that I change the setting to custom even if I did that it will not affect the gameplay of a engine but yeah a chess noob can't understand such things..
Guys after this match I played against the same engine 5 times and all the time the engine beats the a** out of mine which means "it could be a chess.com bug that a maximum (3200) played that badly"
See the game analysis: https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/computer/23501561?tab=review
I know that my accuracy is better than komodo engine which is very weird 
Divesh_99 wrote:
Guys after this match I played against the same engine 5 times and all the time the engine beats the a** out of mine which means "it could be a chess.com bug that a maximum (3200) played that badly"
Maybe the GrandMaster they have chained in the basement to force him to pretend to be the Komodo engine, was sick, had to go to the toilet, and the guy who brings him food took over for just that game.
NervesofButter wrote:
Allow me to be the skeptic here. i know these posts are popular where someone claims to have beaten the strongest engines on this site. But the things they all have in common are:
The time control is never listed.
The number of take backs, etc. is never listed.
There is never anything that shows how much time you used on each move.
The person routinely loses to 1000 players, but can beat a 3200 engine.
A review of the persons games show ZERO games where they played a human at the same level they played against the engine.
Its always "I didnt use an engine." If that is the case why isnt your rating much higher?
First of all chess noob, if you show me the game where I lose to a 1000 player in "rapid" I quit chess today, I only lose to 1000 players in bullet or blitz because I'm bad at speed chess but speed chess doesn't prove a person skills because it is all about speed that's why most of the chess tournament are rapid or classic.
the way bro keeps bolding the word chess noob is actually hilarious. The computer may have been bugged but you made no mistakes as a 1400 player. Thats super duper sus. Even 2200 players would have made at least an innacuracy in that game. you legit walked your king up to the horse to pressure it. No human in the world would even think of doing that in my opinion. Im not saying that its not possible, its just very sus.
This seems sketchy...
First of all this person has never ever played a single game on chess.com (He only plays daily games and bots) in fact having a 1200 rating on daily game he loses to a 800 player and the same guy complain about me on losing to a 1000 player (Which really never happen) such a hippocratic person, After inspecting his profile more I saw that he won all the games with accuracy above 80 he even defeated a bot called "Fatima" which is a 2000 rated bot while being only 1200 now how's that possible instead of calling me sus check your profile first.
Divesh_99 wrote:
NervesofButter wrote:
Ah now i see...You can play the 3200 engine, but you can also handicap it.
Ohh a chess noob is saying that I change the setting to custom even if I did that it will not affect the gameplay of a engine but yeah a chess noob can't understand such things..
Butters uscf is 2000
A 3200 rated bot wouldn’t have missed the fork.
Please Sign Up to comment.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.