I am quickly collecting the conformity of approved chess procedures for tactical thinking and proper analytical play. I think my chess intuition is very bad because I have not read many books. However, I have a good feeling for the game. I can analyze the game with frequency and I have developed a sort of theory of tacticality inside my head.
King Dethorean vs Stockfish 14
Sort:
Please make my rating at least 2800, like Magnus Carlsen's. Thank you.
My theory of tacticality is simple. It's based on profound understanding of philosophy and scientific thought. For that reason I have come to the conclusion that studying the game's intricacies will yield the best results for improvement. In my mind, I believe that studying the endgame relentlessly will lead to the fastest improvement tactically. The subject of chess is one that I understand deeply on an intuitive level.
According to Bobby Fischer, using psychology to make your opponents less focused is unfair. He believed in selecting the best moves possible, nothing to do with mental warfare. I like Bobby Fischer, he resembles Paul Morphy. They are both tactical giants with great awareness of the game's geometry. But Bobby Fischer is surely better because of his deeper understanding of the endgame. A more calculated tactician, no doubt. Much sharper.
Hello, the chess community of this forum. I have something for you to look at.
I consider myself a beginner of sorts, but I have deep intuition for the game. I like the mathematics behind it, like some force of integral equations emerging elegantly for the chess player to indulge in an artful manner. I think I have 100 hours invested into the game, not very much practice. My talent might be quite good, I believe.
I have uploaded the video on Youtube for all to view. The way I played is... I would like to call it tool-assisted. It's not fair play but I doubt it diminishes the excellence behind the strength of my carefully chosen moves.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-Aqb5AI9Gw
Please take a look, I tried my best to beat Stockfish 14 in 21 minutes. I failed however, and I plan to convert the position into a win in my next video. Also, here is the PGN. https://limewire.com/d/PVkaI#mePglNnAL3
My main concern is my low ratings. I want the moderators and admins of chess.com to change my ratings suitably from tactical puzzles to my rating in blitz. My history says I have managed to solve a tactical puzzle that has the difficulty of an Elo rated 2600. But my rapid play rating is only a mere 1082. I was playing against brilliant players surely, but I am dissatisfied with the entire thing because it beckons to me as if I am inadequate in what I am known for dissecting truth and investigation empirical important for my improvement as a beginning chess player. I analyze my own games. In my next Youtube video, I will convert the position of the game into a win. Please analyze the PGN and determine my real rating. And thank you for reading my thread.