I do not understand why so many players want to compare rating inflation/deflation between two platforms. Play,learn,enjoy... wherever.
lichess vs chess.com level

Your rating is not a measure of your chess ability: it's a measure of how you have performed relative to the other players in the same player pool. Chess.com and lichess have different player pools and ratings aren't really comparable between both sites. You may be in the top 1% of players, but how strong are the players in that pool? What rating do people start at?

In lichess I am dancing around the middle 2200 blitz where in chess.com I am dancing around the mid 2000 level. Having a hard time breaking this level.
Is it just me or anyone else feels that ?
Also it could be that it balance out in the higher rating level and lower level. I have a hard time thinking a 3000 blitz lichess is much different then chess.com player. So yeah would be interesting to know what you guys think.
Thanks
On chesscom around your level there are more subtle cheaters. This is why you have problems on chesscom and not on lichessorg.
In lichess I am dancing around the middle 2200 blitz where in chess.com I am dancing around the mid 2000 level. Having a hard time breaking this level.
Is it just me or anyone else feels that ?
Also it could be that it balance out in the higher rating level and lower level. I have a hard time thinking a 3000 blitz lichess is much different then chess.com player. So yeah would be interesting to know what you guys think.
Thanks