Literally Every Lich*ss Casual Game

Sort:
llama47

-

Also

-

 

IrishPawnsToWin

Well, Vishy Anon hasn't been the same since 2013.

Theimmortalpatzer01

I play bullet as an anon on l*chess sometimes. I bet more than half the games are abandoned. Still, I enjoy it because I get paired with players that have wide range of strength and sites like l*chess and chesscom will only pair you with similar strength players. One exception is l*chess arenas in which pairings are purely based on points so at least initially you'll get paired with players of random ratings. There is no login required either which is pretty cool. 

llama47

I guess my post wasn't clear.

I'm not complaining about abandoning (that first game lasted until move 30 or 40 IIRC) I'm saying they lose that e5 pawn every freaking time.

It's not just one person. This is day after day. I'll play this anti berlin d3 Bxc6 (which is played by GMs all the time by the way, so it's not a sneaky or unknown line) and 9 out of 10 players will just lose the pawn on e5.

IrishPawnsToWin
llama47 wrote:

I guess my post wasn't clear.

I'm not complaining about abandoning (that first game lasted until move 30 or 40 IIRC) I'm saying they lose that e5 pawn every freaking time.

It's not just one person. This is day after day. I'll play this anti berlin d3 Bxc6 (which is played by GMs all the time by the way, so it's not a sneaky or unknown line) and 9 out of 10 players will just lose the pawn on e5.

 

You are expecting 2000 rated players to be playing anonymous and waiting to play you? That's like going into a first year language class and complaining students are not able to conjugate verbs yet. 

 

Sign up for 2000+ tournaments and see how they play.

llama47

Literally my only developed piece is attacking literally only one of their pieces... my knight on f3 -- their pawn on e5.

This is not a 2000 level concept.

Obviously some players are terrible or not paying attention. I blunder too... but day after day, player after player, they all lose this pawn. It's very strange.

GM_chess_player
IrishPawnsToWin wrote:
llama47 wrote:

I guess my post wasn't clear.

I'm not complaining about abandoning (that first game lasted until move 30 or 40 IIRC) I'm saying they lose that e5 pawn every freaking time.

It's not just one person. This is day after day. I'll play this anti berlin d3 Bxc6 (which is played by GMs all the time by the way, so it's not a sneaky or unknown line) and 9 out of 10 players will just lose the pawn on e5.

 

You are expecting 2000 rated players to be playing anonymous and waiting to play you? That's like going into a first year language class and complaining students are not able to conjugate verbs yet. 

 

Sign up for 2000+ tournaments and see how they play.

*suspicion of whether this is a troll*

IrishPawnsToWin

Ok, sign up to Lich*ss and play anonymous accounts expecting too much. It's no skin off my back.

llama47

Suspicion on me or him?

GM_chess_player
llama47 wrote:

Suspicion on me or him?

IrishPawnsToWin

IrishPawnsToWin

I would be the party with the St. Paddy's account. So, I must be the troll right?

llama47
GM_chess_player wrote:
llama47 wrote:

Suspicion on me or him?

IrishPawnsToWin

ok

EscherehcsE

Off Topic - I read an article the other day that stated Lich*ss was affected by the cloud server fire in France. I wonder how badly it affected them? (Obviously not critically.)

WhyAyEm

I dont use lichess lol, but im glad i dont because of the e5 pawn madness and my dumb unluckiness

IrishPawnsToWin

This thread will get closed I assume, so before it is locked I will just say I have nothing against either site. Chess.com's bots are more enjoyable to play and I wish we could get more isolated lessons based on them (something for chess.com to think about). Lichess has a free database and it is easier to go over games I have recently played. Maybe it's asking too much, but if you want to win me over resolve these issues.