Live chess rage quit!

Sort:
Viau_A

He quit,I waited my 2 min for the win and blocked him.

PrawnEatsPrawn

Nice moves, though you shouldn't be too hard on your opponent. He was so shell-shocked he was paralysed by fear.

trysts

A two-minute wait doesn't translate into rage, for me. Undecided

Viau_A

No no, instead of pressing the resign button, he quit and I had too wait, no big deal, its just not cool. So I posted the game. I thought I played OK, I usually play d4, not e4.

EternalChess

Hey your lucky Yell.. I made my opponent wait 1 hour 29 minutes in my one game Cool

EDIT: for people who take life seriously I was only joking..

Dont emberass your opponent, some people ahve bad days!

dschaef2

Ah got to love the old nerd rage... It is quite frustrating lol

CPawn
[COMMENT DELETED]
ilikeflags

i don't get it

electricpawn
ilikeflags wrote:

i don't get it


+1

DeathScepter

He just wanted to give you some extra time to enjoy your work before you went on to your next game. Or perhaps he had to go change his shorts. Maybe the overwhelming shock of such profound chess put his into chess-coma and he fell off his chair. Or my personal favorite - perhaps 2 minutes isn't a big deal.

SchofieldKid

Nice, that's one of the reasons i play live chess on FICS instead of on here for the disconnection has no wait time 

heinzie

So who is more rude: the blocked or the blocker?

Nocturnus89

Instead of 12. Qxa8+ should of played rook to e1 to win the queen lol

oinquarki
Nocturnus89 wrote:

Instead of 12. Qxa8+ should of played rook to e1 to win the queen lol


 

RathHood
heinzie wrote:

So who is more rude: the blocked or the blocker?


Ofcourse blocked.

JPF917

LOL. Nocturnus89, thar's a devious, almost sadistic, idea.Wink  I like that in a player!

oinquarki
WalkItDown wrote:
Estragon wrote:

Breaking news:  there are some rude, inconsiderate jerks on the internet.


Nah. People just show their true colors on the internet. Just think how much the chess boards would go flying if the people didn't have the normal social inhibitions in public.


Interesting idea; I've never looked at it that way before. The general consensus seems to be the opposite.

TheGrobe

It's not unlike alcohol -- once the inhibitions are removed, you can catch a glimpse of what lies underneath them.

ivandh

I just laugh at anybody who says that people are good and pure in their hearts.

Well, actually, I do believe that. But the heart is responsible only for pumping blood, and short of causing you to drop dead it cannot really influence behavior...

oinquarki

No, not sarcasm. What I meant was that usually I hear it said that people show their true colors in person and hide them online and that your way of looking at things seemed equally if not more valid.