That would be a great setting great patzer! Not that hard to arrange, I know some London System authors that got crushed by me several times blindfolded. If they dont arrange this match for us I will post the games on facebook and share them with their customers. See you on the battlefield!
London system scrubs
Sort:
Oldest
a blitz 2006.
sure what the heck I can take you!
(big picture, incredibly likely defeat)
1.d4...
ANNOUNCEMENT -- The OP who started this thread, @Clark_757, his acount is now closed. Safe to assume this conversation was completed fabricated.
Much like the thread below -- It's 4 years old, with 12,000 views. Same threadbare topic...Blah, Blah, Blah.
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/the-london-system-is-for-chumps?page=2
Dont worry 2006 is only a provisional rating.
1...Nf6
Wow patzer ma man u gonna play the London bridge system? Hahaha
yep. wth.
I'm not skared of playing an opening.. its just chess.
btw, blindfolded on both sides, agree?
And @FMJackMate is a 4-day wonder on this site, winning at a 10 to one ratio, and every game less than 30 moves. Just like Ripley's Believe It Or Not.
Will engine users, and new account creators never cease ??
Gamers (and engine users Unite)!! They Rule this Site, and its threads. 
well. ok. yes blind folded but I will use a Blank board. I guess this makes the game half blindfolded.
I'm been playing sicilian games like this against a weak chess computer.
I will NOT set up peices and analyze until the game is over.
@zborg. it doesn't matter to me.
its absolutely a done deal that he will beat me anyways. I will just want to try to make a real fight of it! not quite sure whey he wanted it blindfolded...??.
So be it.
2. Nf3
Yeah blindfolded Mister patzer. I am on my phone so I have no board. Yeah zborg I lost once where I messed up hard in time trouble but doesnt matter. And I am just new, no engine user as you can see when you look at my games and username.
2...g6
the modern setup it is
3 Bf4 and it now is officially a london...
3... Bg7
Jul 22, 2016
0
#196
Justs99171 wrote:
Spectator94 wrote:
Going to write down the names of all anti-London people in this thread and should I run into one of them I'll play the London for an easy psychological edge.
You can play it against me. What you just said is stupid. I don't think anybody here is even uncomfortable defending against the London System with the exception of the person who started this thread.
My understanding is that draws with black are good so draws with white are bad.
For an amateur that doesn't want to study?... Damn. Why even play chess?
At top levels, I don't think Carlsen will be playing it against Karjakin this year. Perhaps if he is leading the match, has white, and only needs a draw.
No offence but I think you failing to understand it was a joke is more stupid than anything I could ever say.
Saying London players lack understanding because they don't play into your pet line is silly. Basically you're complaining because they force you to play chess instead of rattling off 25 book moves you memorized while accusing them of doing the same. Sounds like the typical 1500 player who spends 90% of their time memorizing lines and traps instead of understanding anything and inevitably gets destroyed when the book goes out the window. Basically the London is intent on getting a playable position and just playing chess. I'm an e4 player and I essentially do the same thing, though not with a 1 size fits all system. I'm not going to be beaten by some trap you spent 3 hours memorizing on move 17 of the sicilian dragon. I'm going to get a playable position and make you beat me with ideas. I will rely on my own creativity to give me my chances. Not sure what the complaint is,black basically equalize against the London very easily, unlike most mainline openings. Any player with real understanding and not just rote memorization would consider it a gift from white.
Taulmaril wrote:
Saying London players lack understanding because they don't play into your pet line is silly. Basically you're complaining because they force you to play chess instead of rattling off 25 book moves you memorized while accusing them of doing the same. Sounds like the typical 1500 player who spends 90% of their time memorizing lines and traps instead of understanding anything and inevitably gets destroyed when the book goes out the window. Basically the London is intent on getting a playable position and just playing chess. I'm an e4 player and I essentially do the same thing, though not with a 1 size fits all system. I'm not going to be beaten by some trap you spent 3 hours memorizing on move 17 of the sicilian dragon. I'm going to get a playable position and make you beat me with ideas. I will rely on my own creativity to give me my chances. Not sure what the complaint is,black basically equalize against the London very easily, unlike most mainline openings. Any player with real understanding and not just rote memorization would consider it a gift from white.
This. 'nuff said
Jul 22, 2016
0
#199
pfren wrote:
For the record, today Magnus beat Giri for the first time in a regular time control game. Guess what he played as white?
Exactly what I wrote a few pages ago.
You have quite a porfolio of pictures, @TGPatzer.
Keep up the good work.