This is escpecially true after the excuse you have just made claiming that the reason you are not a GM is because you have not read the book you have wrote. Cause it's not like you don't NEED TO cause you are the AUTHOR and know the stuff in the book BETTER THAN ANYONE ELSE
Lyudmil Tsvetkov
Sort:
Wow, I amazed that it took me so long to find this thread.
Iam2busy wrote:
Wow, I amazed that it took me so long to find this thread.
Welcome
0
#125
Lyudmil_Tsvetkov wrote:
EzioAuditore96 wrote:
I'm playing GWTR as well, London system. The setup from Simon Williams chess dvd I believe? I don't have the DVD but I'm sure that's the setup he recommends. Naiditsch and Carlsen played an interesting game in that line just last year.
That is the real London.
SF is too stubborn to lose.
GWTR played Bf4 on move 2.
0
#126
GWTR wrote:
EzioAuditore96 wrote:
I'm playing GWTR as well, London system. The setup from Simon Williams chess dvd I believe? I don't have the DVD but I'm sure that's the setup he recommends. Naiditsch and Carlsen played an interesting game in that line just last year.
You are correct! I love the ginger.
I hope you are enjoying the game.
Yeah, he's great. He was so happy when Levon Aronian used that setup in Gibralter 
.
Yeah I am so far, I've never seen that Nb5 move though in this position. I've only seen dxc5.
0
#127
Iam2busy wrote:
Wow, I amazed that it took me so long to find this thread.
Yes, but now please tell me how to lose this thread...
EscherehcsE wrote:
Iam2busy wrote:
Wow, I amazed that it took me so long to find this thread.
Yes, but now please tell me how to lose this thread...
Now that's funny
.... Without being condesending
Well, the end fortress position from one of the games I just posted.
People say, cheating, fake games.
How did I cheat to reach above position?
SF 9 says 150 centipawns black advantage.
Why did I enter this position at all, if I had used engine assistance?
Does not make sense, does it?
Or, if I have been fiddling with the game in some way, why should I have chosen such a dismal-looking variation for white?
Does not make sense, does it?
Again, this is simply a very human, very natural and very true game, like it or not.
Anyone with a bit of chess brain will easily get that, for the rest I am sorry.
Again, it is not faking that gets me there, but the supreme concepts of my book, just read the freely available TOC: https://www.amazon.com/Secret-Chess-Lyudmil-Tsvetkov/dp/1522041400/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1518084292&sr=1-1#reader_1522041400
Fortress concepts from the book that could help me get that position:
- distant neighbour pawns on the 4th rank, conducive to building fortresses, you see 4 such above, h4.f4,d4 and b4
- more than 6 files closed with pairs of blocked or symmetrical twice backward pawns
So that, no doubt, I have studied a lot and it is the knowledge that gets me there.
Anyone who just gets immersed into the table of Contents will easily agree with me.
EzioAuditore96 wrote:
Lyudmil_Tsvetkov wrote:
EzioAuditore96 wrote:
I'm playing GWTR as well, London system. The setup from Simon Williams chess dvd I believe? I don't have the DVD but I'm sure that's the setup he recommends. Naiditsch and Carlsen played an interesting game in that line just last year.
That is the real London.
SF is too stubborn to lose.
GWTR played Bf4 on move 2.
Hey! Why are telling everyone the Secret of my Chess???
Post #157 Nothing special, any 1500 could see that position is a draw.
hi every wan
aymaneharrou wrote:
hi every wan
Hello, comrade
This has gotten way out of hand. Everyone agrees (Other than Lyudmil of course) that Lyudmil is someone who has not broken 2200 FIDE, wrote a book that got lots of criticism, thinks he is the strongest chess player in the world other than Carlsen, can beat every engine, and spends his entire day on the Chess.com forums looking for haters. The End. 
Lyudmil is probab;y going to blow up after he reads this though.
Kmatta wrote:
This has gotten way out of hand. Everyone agrees (sadly, there were some people that believed him, if I'm not mistaken)(Other than Lyudmil of course) that Lyudmil is someone who has not broken 2200 FIDE(he could possibly play better than 2200 though, though 2500 is probably an overestimate lol), wrote a book that got lots of criticism (agreed), thinks he is the strongest chess player in the world other than Carlsen (he actually claimed that Magnus Carlsen was weak. He seemed to say more that he could beat Carlsen than couldn't), can beat every engine(We never agreed he could beat every chess engine in the world XD), and spends his entire day on the Chess.com forums looking for haters(I actually fully disagree with this. He is looking for praise, but is confused when he doesn't find it. He thinks everyone will believe he is the best chess player in the world cause he created a decent chess book. The main reason why he's confused is because he thinks his decent book is the best chess book ever written in the history of chess books.). The End. Lyudmil is probab;y going to blow up after he reads this though.
stewardjandstewardj wrote:
Kmatta wrote:
This has gotten way out of hand. Everyone agrees (sadly, there were some people that believed him, if I'm not mistaken)(Other than Lyudmil of course) that Lyudmil is someone who has not broken 2200 FIDE(he could possibly play better than 2200 though, though 2500 is probably an overestimate lol), wrote a book that got lots of criticism (agreed), thinks he is the strongest chess player in the world other than Carlsen (he actually claimed that Magnus Carlsen was weak. He seemed to say more that he could beat Carlsen than couldn't), can beat every engine(We never agreed he could beat every chess engine in the world XD), and spends his entire day on the Chess.com forums looking for haters(I actually fully disagree with this. He is looking for praise, but is confused when he doesn't find it. He thinks everyone will believe he is the best chess player in the world cause he created a decent chess book. The main reason why he's confused is because he thinks his decent book is the best chess book ever written in the history of chess books.). The End. Lyudmil is probab;y going to blow up after he reads this though.
I agree with everything except the "possibly better than 2200" part and maybe the "decent chess book" part. If it was truly a decent chess book, it would contain true insight instead of pseudo-intellectual terms and centipawn values.
I wish some of would read Human Versus Machine, Part 1. It is really good.
https://www.amazon.com/Human-Versus-Machine-Stockfish-Komodo-ebook/dp/B0768G8R2C/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=
Lol
Please Sign Up to comment.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
Great, another thread about Lyudmil and the silly claims he makes.
What Lyudmil thinks of his claims:
What I think about his claims:
What other people think of his claims:
This may be harsh, but it's just the truth