Magnus is mean

Sort:
DanielGuel

Computer says 0.00. Equal position, right? 

...

Magnus is completely winning three moves later

DanielGuel

And disclaimer: it is a difficult 0.00 position. However, it still shows how Magnus routinely wins equal positions vs strong Grandmasters. 

alphaous

Yeah! But where's that blog you promised, though?

vcRobertS

thumbup.png

Kowarenai

well antonio did say it in one of his video titles, no one grinds like the world champion ❤️

Fisikhad
He shows no mercy
colorfulcake

it’s magnus

Fire

magnsus

The_swooping_lion

Why do you jump to the conclusion that he is mean?

AZ2019chess
100% Magnus
alphaous
TacticalPrecision wrote:

Magnus is another loser who needs to get a life and learn how to take a draw. The man is insane. Sitting there for 8+ hours pushing for a win. It would be impressive in a real sport but when it comes to a Parker Brother's board game? It's just weird. 

Still salty? Lol, if you can't appreciate a professional at the very top doing what he does best, go do something else with your life other than whining on the forums. One, this was a rapid game, so it did not take 8+ hours. Two, this is a tournament with massive cash prizes that in a tour he, in a very cool business move, organized on Chess24 with his Play Magnus Group. (No mods, Chess.com is better, don't lock this topic I was just stating a fact) So cash is on the line, as well as pride. Not to mention, Daniel himself mentioned it was a difficult draw, something I don't think you know the concept of, meaning that it was a matter of at some points finding ONE move for Artemiev. Magnus knew Artemiev would have a hard time, so he didn't offer a draw and it paid off.

Gymstar

wow

Stil1

It's just a miscalculation by Artemiev.

He looked ahead a few moves, and saw this position:

Then he stopped calculating there, as it looks, visually, as if both colors queen at the same time. No need to calculate any further.

He just missed that the very next move was mate. meh.png

He would've needed to calculate farther in this line, see that it ended in mate, then discount the whole line and begin calculating again, starting with a different first move ...

technical_knockout

he's a multi-millionaire now from chess.

DanielGuel
alphaous wrote:

Yeah! But where's that blog you promised, though?

Where my children are. Unborn and nonexistent (as of now) wink.png

Shillaber

How can you slag Magnus? What a great champion.

Awesometrsqa
TacticalPrecision wrote:
Shillaber wrote:

How can you slag Magnus? What a great champion.

 

It's his overt obsession with playing the game and winning. It's *weird*. He's not even like a real person - just some prefabbed chess machine. The man would rather die than offer a draw. Regardless of what kind of champion he is, there's obviously something wrong with him. 

How can you attack someone who has been working on what they love? You are just an insignificant brat whose never done ANYTHING worth noting and if you feel this way you should just quit chess and give your diamond membership to someone who actually needs it.

Kowarenai
alphaous wrote:
TacticalPrecision wrote:

Magnus is another loser who needs to get a life and learn how to take a draw. The man is insane. Sitting there for 8+ hours pushing for a win. It would be impressive in a real sport but when it comes to a Parker Brother's board game? It's just weird. 

Still salty? Lol, if you can't appreciate a professional at the very top doing what he does best, go do something else with your life other than whining on the forums.

friend he is @digitalwarfare, i wouldnt talk with him after his history

Kowarenai
TacticalPrecision wrote:
Shillaber wrote:

How can you slag Magnus? What a great champion.

 

It's his overt obsession with playing the game and winning. It's *weird*. He's not even like a real person - just some prefabbed chess machine. The man would rather die than offer a draw. Regardless of what kind of champion he is, there's obviously something wrong with him. 

that statement is any game where people are competitive and have the motivation to win and as most average people would agree the game of chess is just war. if you want a lazy fight for it but if you want to win keep on fighting cause the only person you can prove wrong is your opponent and you have to show that. if you cant prove anything and save the position, what right doesnt magnus have to keep on fighting? thats just being hypocritical of you

DrSpudnik

You're supposed to play the game to win. Otherwise, what's the point?