Modern Military Analogues for Chess Pieces

Sort:
FrancisWeed

knights- texas cavalry

FrancisWeed

board- 1000 million mile sphere around earth

FrancisWeed

players- human beings

FrancisWeed

universe- this universe

yqtmothra

Mine goes like this,

Pawn: Infantry Platoons/Companies

Knight: Engineering/Mortar Squads

Bishop: Fighter Planes

Rook: Tanks or Artillery

Queen: Delta Force Squad

King: Brigadier General 

Sometimes I use black as the attacking navy/marines 

BoardMonkey

pawn = infantry

knight = cavalry

bishop = snipers

rook = direct support artillery

queen = general support artillery

king = headquarters

LeChessDudeMaybe
Emperor111 wrote:

Magnus Carlsen- Napoleon Bonaparte/Julius Ceaser           

 

yes funny

 

LeChessDudeMaybe

But seriously even in medieval times if this is a medieval army there should be cannons no cap

FrancisWeed
RaistlinOfKrynn wrote:

ROOKS----armored forces (i.e., Tanks; light, medium, and heavy, depending upon the pressure exerted upon the chessboard file/rank)...PAWNS----infantry forces...BISHOPS----artillery forces (both long-range and short-range, depending upon pressure exerted upon the chessboard diagonal)...KNIGHTS----a combination of ground-attack helicopters and APCs...QUEEN----the airforces (both air-to-air combat for air superiority over the battlefield [queen vs. queen] and ground-attack aircraft)...KINGS----Command HQ, along with accompanying elite ground forces...**remember, chess simulates a land battle, so the King will not necessarily represent the leader of the nation unless that leader is also in the field, which hadn't happened dince the 1800s.**

in the untied states they call the king the commander in chief. They are the highest leader in the armed forces

RaistlinOfKrynn

The President of the United States--a.k.a, 'Commander In Chief'--never accompanies ground forces into combat!! ...🙄...my chess pieces-military analogy covers the various things that ARE present on the battlefield, including the General (who is part of Command HQ [HeadQuarters]).

FrancisWeed
RaistlinOfKrynn wrote:

The President of the United States--a.k.a, 'Commander In Chief'--never accompanies ground forces into combat!! ...🙄...my chess pieces-military analogy covers the various things that ARE present on the battlefield, including the General (who is part of Command HQ [HeadQuarters]).

but in modern times the president is present on the battlefield via headset. Generals are often not present in the field as well.

LeadHard

wr.png Armor/Engineers: Tanks can engage targets very far, but only in direct line of sight. and engineers can break or create barriers along the battlefield line.

wn.png Cavalry/Air Cav: Mobile and quick, can always swoop behind the enemy lines, but can't fight alone. It needs a rear cover, just like cavalry units.

wb.pngArtillery: Can strike VERY far, diagonally across the entire battlefield. However, the terrain and ballistic restrict direct attack, so it needs to attack at an angle. Weak when faced with direct confrontation.

wp.pngInfantry: The strength is equivalent to the formation and adjacent units. Depending on the situation, one unit can cause a lot of damage, but if left alone, it is only a matter of time before it goes down.

wq.png Airforce: Dominates the entire battlefield. When you don't have air superiority, sometimes the game is already over.

wk.png HQ: Command and control. This is where the mission comes from. No battles are fought at the HQ. but for the HQ. All your assets are there to protect the HQ and advance its mission. If it goes down, game over. There's nothing to fight for...