PAWN'S are always underestimated,the queen is not really the most powerful piece,like everyone think's she is,there's only one of her and EIGHT of them. they are 1 point but in reality they should each be worth 100 point's cuz no other piece can promote itself like the PAWN can,and no other piece is worth so little but has SOOO MUUUUCH INFLUENCE over the whole board.if anyone would like to comment and discuss this topic please feel free too THANX
PAWN'S
Sort:
smiley15 wrote:
I would prefer to discuss your grammar and all bold technique.
wut u mean?
smiley15 wrote:
This is bold, and the apostrophe for every word that ends in 's' is just, to put it nicely, interesting. It gives most people the feeling that you're a little... slow.
wow well if they think that low about me perhaps they should get an education cuz the chances are my I.Q is far above their understanding, thanx for the insult
jasonIsVeryLonelyWal wrote:
PAWN'S are always underestimated,the queen is not really the most powerful piece,like everyone think's she is,there's only one of her and EIGHT of them. they are 1 point but in reality they should each be worth 100 point's cuz no other piece can promote itself like the PAWN can,and no other piece is worth so little but has SOOO MUUUUCH INFLUENCE over the whole board.if anyone would like to comment and discuss this topic please feel free too THANX
anyone else wanna have a decent intelligent discussion about PAWN'S ?
[COMMENT DELETED]
caseyFgriffin wrote:
I think one of the points that smiley is trying to get across and the onen that caught my eye, or one of the many that caught my eye is when you put the apostrophe inbetween 'pawns' and 's' what the word means then is 'pawns is' so just drop the apostrophe and well... Not much will happen really, your grammar - or lack of it seems like a lost cause.
ok thank you ,but 1. who cares? u know? when someone reads it they know what i'm trying to say (hopefully..lol)and 2. instead of focusing on the stupid stuff Y can't people just respond to the post like decent human beings and stop picking on little things that dont matter? i understand the concern but do i go and edit his forum? nooooo so i would appreciate the same respect.thanx and take care
Dem dang textn kidz r takn ovr da place's.
ow smiley15 wrote:
Point taken, but u woodnt rite n essay 4 ur english teacher like dis wud u? Just remember that.
wow ur immature u know that? grow up and comment on some lses page would ya? i got enuff bullshit in my life i don't need ur's or anyone elses...oh whoops i just misspelled a word,who cares tho
Joseph-S wrote:
Dem dang textn kidz r takn ovr da place's.
@joseph lol ur funny...u would think people would hav something better to do than edit posts,this isn't english class or a spellin forum it's a chess forum,lol
jasonIsVeryLonelyWal wrote:
Edited for comprehension.
Pawns are underestimated because people don't realize there are eight of them. The queen is not powerful because there is only one of her. The accepted value of the pawn is one point, but I propose each pawn is worth 100 points. I believe they are worth 100 points because they can promote to pieces that, under this system are more than 10 times less valuable than an un-promoted pawn. While this seems to not make sense, the point is that this capability is unique among the chessmen and it is from this which their incredible value stems.
I also propose pawns are worth very little (yeah, he actually says this lol) but at the same time have great influence over every square on the board.
I would like to discuss this idea in great detail, please comment below.
Another problem is that some people actually have reading comprehension and what you said makes no sense even if it were said well (see above).
The biggest problem however is I'm feeding a troll.
fzweb wrote:
QED
@ fzweb...thank you someone actually posts something constructive,lol i do appreciate it 4 real
Apr 17, 2011
0
#12
sometimes there seems to be more interest in grammar than chess on chess.com. Nerds?
Heh, obvious troll is obvious 
Pro tip If you want to do the little kid up past their bed time thing, don't use big words, make your sentences more simple, and don't recognize what QED is.
Jebcc wrote:
sometimes there seems to be more interest in grammar than chess on chess.com. Nerds?
@jebcc lol yeah they are nerds,it's about ches's lol i mispelled it on purpose whoops so what do u think about the topic of PAWNS?
waffllemaster wrote:
jasonIsVeryLonelyWal wrote:
Edited for comprehension.
Pawns are underestimated because people don't realize there are eight of them. The queen is not powerful because there is only one of her. The accepted value of the pawn is one point, but I propose each pawn is worth 100 points. I believe they are worth 100 points because they can promote to pieces that, under this system are more than 10 times less valuable than an un-promoted pawn. While this seems to not make sense, the point is that this capability is unique among the chessmen and it is from this which their incredible value stems.
I also propose pawns are worth very little (yeah, he actually says this lol) but at the same time have great influence over every square on the board.
I would like to discuss this idea in great detail, please comment below.
Another problem is that some people actually have reading comprehension and what you said makes no sense even if it were said well (see above).
The biggest problem however is I'm feeding a troll.
thanx waffle master,i was just expressing my opinion and if people don't agree how i wrote it well life goes on, lol u know? when one looks at the chess board as a whole and applies wisdom of chess i think even the most experienced chess players might agree that the pawns are the most powerful
What I'm saying is your opinion contradicts itself. You assign value to a single pawn due to there being 8 single pawns. That's like saying a single dollar is worth more because you have multiple single bills.
You say the queen is weak because there is one of her.
You say the pawns are worth 100 point because they can promote to pieces worth less than 100 points.
You end by saying pawns have a low value (yes, even though you just said they were the most valuable) but in spite of their low value they influence every square.
Just because you know what you mean, doesn't mean we know what you're trying to say. If we read your words as they are, they don't really communicate anything see?
yeah i see,i was just honestly using the 100 point thing figuritively,but i guess it didn't come across that way,but people shouldn't be asshole's about it, they can just ask me what i meant and then i'll explain.no one has to say retarded stuff about it u know?