Fischer was psychotic, 2 bishops are stronger than a queen, h4 is the best opening, computers have proved chess is a win for black, chess is a sport but not a science etc etc.
Why do trolls have so many posts? I have more lack of respect for the people who respond to them, and they get pages upon pages. I used to think this site had some intelligent people who ignored the trolls and discussed sane interesting parts of chess. I guess I was wrong. So I'll try a bit of trolling to get some interest,...
one last try, anyone out there want to discuss ideas, comments etc about my chess photography project from the page before or chess in art in general...
funny. i always found it interesting why people would get so angry that "trolls" would get so many comments on their threads like it's some sort of comment competition and "trolling" was in some way cheating or unsportsmanlike.
Fischer was psychotic, 2 bishops are stronger than a queen, h4 is the best opening, computers have proved chess is a win for black, chess is a sport but not a science etc etc.
Why do trolls have so many posts? I have more lack of respect for the people who respond to them, and they get pages upon pages. I used to think this site had some intelligent people who ignored the trolls and discussed sane interesting parts of chess. I guess I was wrong. So I'll try a bit of trolling to get some interest,...
one last try, anyone out there want to discuss ideas, comments etc about my chess photography project from the page before or chess in art in general...
funny. i always found it interesting why people would get so angry that "trolls" would get so many comments on their threads like it's some sort of comment competition and "trolling" was in some way cheating or unsportsmanlike.