In short, the ELO of the computers is not representative of the ELO of competitive players here on the site.
Playing against Chess.com computer (Master level)
Sort:
Nov 17, 2020
0
#3
Alramech написал:
In short, the ELO of the computers is not representative of the ELO of competitive players here on the site.
Yes, I agree with your opinion on this matter!
Nov 21, 2020
0
#5
Crazy-fou написал:
Bravo, Maximus !
Hi Nino😊!
If you played against master level bots, then share your experience too))
But I think I already understood how these strong bots work! In my opinion, bots do some weak moves at beginning (debut), but then play very strong in the middlegame and ending, so hard to beat them even if you have extra figure or good winning position! But if we play against real Master FIDE, these players will try to beat us from the beginning till the ending! They will not give us any chances!😊
If you didn't play so far, then try to beat the bots just for FUN!
Bots are weird. They’ll be playing great then they’ll play a move that makes absolutely no sense or randomly hang a piece, completely turning the game in your favor. Real people don’t play like that.
Nov 21, 2020
0
#7
I think, it is better to play with the real people, but always check the mistakes with the strongest computer.
HIARCS doesn’t seem to do as much of those occasional ridiculously bad moves, even at the lower levels.
Nov 21, 2020
0
#9
Guys, thanks for good comments! And my answers to you:
Even if the computer bot gives you piece for nothing, it is hard to beat them with winning positions!
Agree, best to play with people! More interesting! But sometimes maybe playing against strong bot is also useful practice, maybe we can learn something!
I never heard of HIARCS, I use all the time chess.com Stockfish after games! And of course heard of Alpha Zero and other popular engines too!
Nov 21, 2020
0
#10
I played against the engine at level 18 (2200) and I pretty much destroyed it. I was expecting more of a challenge.
Based on the feel of things, I'd say the computer plays about 200 points weaker than whatever rating it's listed at.
Nov 21, 2020
0
#11
TestPatzer написал:
I played against the engine at level 18 (2200) and I pretty much destroyed it. I was expecting more of a challenge.
Based on the feel of things, I'd say the computer plays about 200 points weaker than whatever rating it's listed at.
👍 Confirming my words!
Nov 21, 2020
0
#12
Epiloque написал:
I beat all the Beth Harmons even the 2700 one (bullet lmao) so yeah they are crap
Friend, if you beat that poor girl so many times and destroyed her, then as a good man you need to marry her 😊😛
Actually in personality bots section 2200 and 2300 are termed masters. But check out the other engine section there 2300 is termed expert. There is some contradiction there in the website.
But it's really nice playing the bots.
Jun 28, 2021
0
#15
learningchessdotnet написал:
Actually in personality bots section 2200 and 2300 are termed masters. But check out the other engine section there 2300 is termed expert. There is some contradiction there in the website.
But it's really nice playing the bots.
I agree with you!
I recently played against Chess.com computer, master level, against 8 guys whose rating is 2200-2450. So, I won Noam (2200 rating), and played draw with Arjun (2300 rating). Actually, I won Noam after several games. So, guys how could I beat master level (2200-2300) when I have 1875-1950 blitz rating in this site?
Are master level's rating is exactly 2200-2450 or computer plays a little bit weaker to encourage us and to think that we are very good player?