Playing slowly - stupid question fair play

Sort:
Oldest
BlunderKing1987

I have never studied this unwritten rule, but should I play fast in blitz games, to match the pace of my opponent, am I obligated to do so? It seems like the time limit itself dictates the rules and running out of time means losing the game fair and square. Is there a limit to what is considered fair? Let's say my opponent plays a tricky move and I spent 2 and a half minutes thinking in a 3 minute game, then try to speed up if possible or lose the game. Some people seem to resign for no reason to show me perhaps I run down the clock intentionally, but I am really thinking about my move desperately the entire time. I just can't play an obvious blunder if all I see on the board is blunders, it is just not me. I only play the inferior move if I spend almost all my time avoiding an obvious blunder. the question is, are my opponents just impatient and it is their fault, or should I be banned for slow play. If so, you have a chance to analyze my games an ban me. It is just me and my nature playing this way and nobody can change that. I am not gonna play a bad move that I know to be bad if there's more than 20 seconds on the clock. I only do it when I can't find any moves that don't lose on the spot.
There's always a chance the position simplifies later and the increment is enough to at least draw the game.

eric0022
BlunderKing1987 wrote:

I have never studied this unwritten rule, but should I play fast in blitz games, to match the pace of my opponent, am I obligated to do so? It seems like the time limit itself dictates the rules and running out of time means losing the game fair and square. Is there a limit to what is considered fair? Let's say my opponent plays a tricky move and I spent 2 and a half minutes thinking in a 3 minute game, then try to speed up if possible or lose the game. Some people seem to resign for no reason to show me perhaps I run down the clock intentionally, but I am really thinking about my move desperately the entire time. I just can't play an obvious blunder if all I see on the board is blunders, it is just not me. I only play the inferior move if I spend almost all my time avoiding an obvious blunder. the question is, are my opponents just impatient and it is their fault, or should I be banned for slow play. If so, you have a chance to analyze my games an ban me. It is just me and my nature playing this way and nobody can change that. I am not gonna play a bad move that I know to be bad if there's more than 20 seconds on the clock. I only do it when I can't find any moves that don't lose on the spot.
There's always a chance the position simplifies later and the increment is enough to at least draw the game.

You cannot be banned for slow play. That one is normal, although some players may have thoughts on why you suddenly played much more quickly in the later stages of the game.

However, in my opponent intentionally stalls in an entirely lost position, I would report the guy - no questions.

tygxc

You can use your time as you see fit.

marqumax
Just don’t stall intentionally
darlihysa

If you are a pro chess player or an OTB citizen you must master this skill. All otb players know the fact that blitz and online chess breaks their gears and it is a bad habit but to beat the last move before time ends they need to train at blitz or online chess gives another pace to your rhythm

BlunderKing1987
eric0022 wrote:
BlunderKing1987 wrote:

I have never studied this unwritten rule, but should I play fast in blitz games, to match the pace of my opponent, am I obligated to do so? It seems like the time limit itself dictates the rules and running out of time means losing the game fair and square. Is there a limit to what is considered fair? Let's say my opponent plays a tricky move and I spent 2 and a half minutes thinking in a 3 minute game, then try to speed up if possible or lose the game. Some people seem to resign for no reason to show me perhaps I run down the clock intentionally, but I am really thinking about my move desperately the entire time. I just can't play an obvious blunder if all I see on the board is blunders, it is just not me. I only play the inferior move if I spend almost all my time avoiding an obvious blunder. the question is, are my opponents just impatient and it is their fault, or should I be banned for slow play. If so, you have a chance to analyze my games an ban me. It is just me and my nature playing this way and nobody can change that. I am not gonna play a bad move that I know to be bad if there's more than 20 seconds on the clock. I only do it when I can't find any moves that don't lose on the spot.
There's always a chance the position simplifies later and the increment is enough to at least draw the game.

You cannot be banned for slow play. That one is normal, although some players may have thoughts on why you suddenly played much more quickly in the later stages of the game.

However, in my opponent intentionally stalls in an entirely lost position, I would report the guy - no questions.

No, I usually resign on the spot if it is entirely lost, but if I feel I have a killer move somewhere or want to prove his bishop sacrifice or something was stupid, I take my time not to rush it to overlook something stupid as then they live their life thinkin that bishop sacrifice into my castled king pawns is something they can afford to play all the time.
They usually laugh they won on time as I find it super embarrassing I couldn't defend a clearly objectively defendable position. But that's usually all it takes. If I try the same strategy on my opponents, surprisingly getting them thinking rarely works as they just play at a normal pace. I don't get why they don't get intimidated by these dangerous positions. And they are not some brilliant players.

medelpad
It’s good to try to match the speed of your opponent, preferably you never wanna be behind more than like 30 seconds as if you were to enter a time scramble; you are bound to lose.
Forums
Forum Legend
Following
New Comments
Locked Topic
Pinned Topic