I just started watching the Queen's Gambit (the miniseries) and in the 1st episode there's a scene where she loses a queen (I don't remember in what way), and the custodian tells her that if she loses her queen like that she must resign, but she doesn't want to resign, she wants to keep playing and then they have a spat. My question is isthere such a rule in chess (or any other rules where you have to resign) or did the custodian in the series make that up?
No, in chess there is no situation where you must resign. Any player is completely free to keep playing until there is checkmate, stalemate, the clock runs out, or another kind of draw is agreed or claimed.
Essentially, Beth goes down a full queen for nothing. "Why keep playing?" is essentially what the custodian is saying. Some chess players, like the custodian, feel that it is more respectful to resign a game when you lose such a decisive amount of material so that you don't force your winning opponent to have to keep playing that game.
In short, it may be a sign of respect to resign a game when you are clearly losing. However when you are new to chess, you should not resign until the game is over. You should play it out to see how the game unfolds. And often times, your opponent may blunder and give you a fighting chance.
I just started watching the Queen's Gambit (the miniseries) and in the 1st episode there's a scene where she loses a queen (I don't remember in what way), and the custodian tells her that if she loses her queen like that she must resign, but she doesn't want to resign, she wants to keep playing and then they have a spat. My question is isthere such a rule in chess (or any other rules where you have to resign) or did the custodian in the series make that up?