Rules of chess: any situations where you MUST resign?

Sort:
Mr_Check58

I just started watching the Queen's Gambit (the miniseries) and in the 1st episode there's a scene where she loses a queen (I don't remember in what way), and the custodian tells her that if she loses her queen like that she must resign, but she doesn't want to resign, she wants to keep playing and then they have a spat.  My question is isthere such a rule in chess (or any other rules where you have to resign) or did the custodian in the series make that up?

Alramech
Mr_Check58 wrote:

I just started watching the Queen's Gambit (the miniseries) and in the 1st episode there's a scene where she loses a queen (I don't remember in what way), and the custodian tells her that if she loses her queen like that she must resign, but she doesn't want to resign, she wants to keep playing and then they have a spat.  My question is isthere such a rule in chess (or any other rules where you have to resign) or did the custodian in the series make that up?

No, in chess there is no situation where you must resign.  Any player is completely free to keep playing until there is checkmate, stalemate, the clock runs out, or another kind of draw is agreed or claimed.

Essentially, Beth goes down a full queen for nothing.  "Why keep playing?" is essentially what the custodian is saying.  Some chess players, like the custodian, feel that it is more respectful to resign a game when you lose such a decisive amount of material so that you don't force your winning opponent to have to keep playing that game.

In short, it may be a sign of respect to resign a game when you are clearly losing.  However when you are new to chess, you should not resign until the game is over.  You should play it out to see how the game unfolds.  And often times, your opponent may blunder and give you a fighting chance.

tygxc

You never have to resign.
Here is an example where Reshevsky plays on a queen down against Fischer.
https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1008376 

x-3232926362

That scene is really problematic, they shouldn't have included it in the show. There's no unspoken rule that says you have to resign when down material. There's no obligation to resign at all contrary to what some may want you to believe. Especially if you are a beginner, which Beth was at the time of that scene.

badatchess53

Sheibel was a typical angry chess.com player. “Omg you’re taking so long to move”. “Resign already.”

x-3232926362
TacticalPrecision wrote:

You're supposed to resign as soon as you go down material. No sense in wasting people's time and ensuring you'll never get another game at the club again. 

At my club there are a few kids who always play until a checkmate. Nobody complains about them let alone boycotts them.

x-3232926362

They are good kids, quite polite and respectful and know etiquette well. But probably someone should teach you that. You are a troll, sir.

x-3232926362

Whatever you choose to believe, I don't give a damn.

x-3232926362

You have no idea about my life and what I care about. But when did it ever stop a troll?

GoldenDegree

There's no rule to resign and it's not disrespectful or anything. The only case where it would be disrespectful to not resign is if you're in a losing position and you need to leave.

Joseph_Truelsons_Fan
TacticalPrecision wrote:

You're supposed to resign as soon as you go down material. No sense in wasting people's time and ensuring you'll never get another game at the club again. 

thats probably the reason why ur only 800

on chess.com thats even less than otb

Joseph_Truelsons_Fan
TacticalPrecision wrote:
Joseph_Truelsons_Fan wrote:
TacticalPrecision wrote:

You're supposed to resign as soon as you go down material. No sense in wasting people's time and ensuring you'll never get another game at the club again. 

thats probably the reason why ur only 800

on chess.com thats even less than otb

I have no idea where you're getting 800 from but in any event: I don't care about my chess ratings. I resign games left and right in winning positions when my opponent won't resign. I don't calculate or pay much attention to what's going on in the game. It's a casual board game with nothing on the line. I'm not wasting energy on that and neither should anyone else lol. 

ig thats fair

u do u

x-0460907528
TacticalPrecision wrote:

You're supposed to resign as soon as you go down material. No sense in wasting people's time and ensuring you'll never get another game at the club again. 

so the first person to capture a pawn (or any piece) wins? that should save us all a lot of time!

x-0460907528
TacticalPrecision wrote:
AntiMustard wrote:

They are good kids, quite polite and respectful and know etiquette quite well. But probably someone should teach you that. You are a troll, sir.

No, trolling is playing on in a dead lost position. It's America in 2022. Nobody has time for that. 

first, that is NOT what trolling is. second, if you dont have enough time to play a game of chess don't play. BAM! another problem solved!

Joseph_Truelsons_Fan
TacticalPrecision wrote:
pawnstar1957 wrote:
TacticalPrecision wrote:

You're supposed to resign as soon as you go down material. No sense in wasting people's time and ensuring you'll never get another game at the club again. 

so the first person to capture a pawn (or any piece) wins? that should save us all a lot of time!

It will. Why would you want to waste your time? 

the answer anybody who was serious about chess would give would be "we want to win"

which is the same answer I'll give now

Because we want to win.

Joseph_Truelsons_Fan
TacticalPrecision wrote:
Joseph_Truelsons_Fan wrote:
TacticalPrecision wrote:
pawnstar1957 wrote:
TacticalPrecision wrote:

You're supposed to resign as soon as you go down material. No sense in wasting people's time and ensuring you'll never get another game at the club again. 

so the first person to capture a pawn (or any piece) wins? that should save us all a lot of time!

It will. Why would you want to waste your time? 

the answer anybody who was serious about chess would be "we want to win"

which is the same answer I'll give now

Because we want to win.

Why? You don't actually win anything. 

I beg to differ

I won 700 bucks last week from a chess tournament

Joseph_Truelsons_Fan

wtf are you talking about

https://chessevents.com/event/goldenstate/2022/standings/u2100 

I'm not going to dox myself so I won't say who I am

Joseph_Truelsons_Fan

you can see the "Prizes" at the right

x-3232926362

TacticalPrecision, there's a world outside of America. Just so you know.

Joseph_Truelsons_Fan

and that's just one tournament

the continental chess association holds a bunch

along with USCF

they all have cash prizes