And SF doesn't know bishop+knight checkmate.
Stockfish is Dumb

It assesses White is winning here. The position is 0.00
It's not just Stockfish. You'd probably be hard pressed to find any engine that realizes it's a draw.
Yet a 1400 player can see in 3 seconds it is a draw. What if earlier SF had a choice of trades and could have had a bishop or knight and chose the bishop because it is an open position and the bishop is worth a few centipawns more?

Yet a 1400 player can see in 3 seconds it is a draw. What if earlier SF had a choice of trades and could have had a bishop or knight and chose the bishop because it is an open position and the bishop is worth a few centipawns more?
In full disclosure, I did not come up with this on my own. Simon “Ginger GM“ has an interesting video on Chess engine quirks. For the heck of it I decided to set up the position and see what the computer thought of the position for myself, and voilà he was right.
But truth be told, if I managed to force Stockfish into such a position I would feel like a God.

If it was dumb then this wouldn't be news.

Engines simply aren't too good at calculating fortresses. For a human, however, it's easy to see no breakthrough for white; even trying w/ his bishop doesn't work as black can simply repeat w/ Kc7 and Kd6 to score a draw.

Put one bishop on g2 and get the other to g7, then take on e5 when the king steps back. Two same color bishops is a win for White.
Two (or generally more) same coloured bishops is usually NOT a win without co-operation.
Eg try 3k4/8/2B5/3B4/4B3/8/8/4K3 w - - 0 1 in a tablebase.
(I am unsure why people have copied the starting board from a draft of my post: this was only there because of what seems like a remaining bug in the diagram editor).
It assesses White is winning here. The position is 0.00