subscribes should be able to only play other subscribers.

Sort:
Oldest
satom
why doesn't chess.com have separate live games for paying subscribers. if we have to pay for diamond, we are more serious and less likely to cheat. instead, I have to play people who constantly leave the game and look up answers - surprise- they don't subscribe! subscribing should have privilege- why else pay 14/ month?
IMBacon22

Paying for a diamond membership does not make you more serious about chess.  I paid for a diamond membership, and this site is not the site i go to for serious play.  You do have priviliges as a paying member.  

ActuallySleepy
It should still be an option.. there should also be a members only forms without having to make a club. I've never been a paid member but it still only makes sense for there to be extra areas of the site that open up once you pay.
IMBacon22
skcollobgib wrote:
May I ask mr Bacon, where you go for serious chess. I would like some of that action?

ICC, and lichess.

IMBacon22
AlkinKing wrote:
It should still be an option.. there should also be a members only forms without having to make a club. I've never been a paid member but it still only makes sense for there to be extra areas of the site that open up once you pay.

There are areas that open up:

unlimited tournaments

more vacation

Unlimited tactics

Unlimited chess mentor

Unlimited chess videos

amongst others things

MayCaesar

I think it is a silly premise, but I think having a filter on only accepting challenges from subscribers wouldn't hurt.

economicatheist
MayCaesar wrote:

I think it is a silly premise, but I think having a filter on only accepting challenges from subscribers wouldn't hurt.

This is a very good idea. 

Forums
Forum Legend
Following
New Comments
Locked Topic
Pinned Topic