was bobby fischer a sigma male?
Sort:
RVSP16
Oct 19, 2024
0
#1
Oct 19, 2024
0
#2
Homework_24 wrote:
only chess questions here
he is a chess player so we are talking about a chess players biography
and it is in the category of general chess discussions
Shouldn't this be in Chess Players?
"Sigma male" isn't a thing. It's just some dumb internet slang.
Oct 20, 2024
0
#6
magipi wrote:
"Sigma male" isn't a thing. It's just some dumb internet slang.
I believe in it science says when a male gets the control over his mind and leaves attraction of the opposite gender some sort supernatural-power grows in the masculine body we is in short "celibacy'' and in internet language ''sigma male''.
"sigma male" has nothing to do with science, it's a term originated from the incel community and that is where it should stay. Literally nobody cares about it, it's bs.
If you have peer reviewed scientific papers related to it feel free to post a link but until then you don't use "science says"...
He was on that grindset for sure. But the sigma life was too much for him and he went off the deep end.
Oct 20, 2024
0
#9
OutOfCheese wrote:
"sigma male" has nothing to do with science, it's a term originated from the incel community and that is where it should stay. Literally nobody cares about it, it's bs.
If you have peer reviewed scientific papers related to it feel free to post a link but until then you don't use "science says"...
ok not ''sigma male but '' celibacy'' semen retention '' is proved by science
?
RVSP16 wrote:
OutOfCheese wrote:
"sigma male" has nothing to do with science, it's a term originated from the incel community and that is where it should stay. Literally nobody cares about it, it's bs.
If you have peer reviewed scientific papers related to it feel free to post a link but until then you don't use "science says"...
ok not ''sigma male but '' celibacy'' semen retention '' is proved by science
For real, here's a real photo of me after 5 days of retention
If it was "proven by science" then it would be very easy for you to link that proof, wouldn't it.
Asking the real question now are we
RVSP16 wrote:
magipi wrote:
"Sigma male" isn't a thing. It's just some dumb internet slang.
I believe in it science says when a male gets the control over his mind and leaves attraction of the opposite gender some sort supernatural-power grows in the masculine body we is in short "celibacy'' and in internet language ''sigma male''.
I really hope that you are trolling. If you really believe that, you should probably seek professional help.
Oct 20, 2024
0
#17
magipi wrote:
RVSP16 wrote:
magipi wrote:
"Sigma male" isn't a thing. It's just some dumb internet slang.
I believe in it science says when a male gets the control over his mind and leaves attraction of the opposite gender some sort supernatural-power grows in the masculine body we is in short "celibacy'' and in internet language ''sigma male''.
I really hope that you are trolling. If you really believe that, you should probably seek professional help.
(not in the science in which we use but in Indian Acient science you can read all vedas Bhagvat gita Shastra Jain and bhuddhist religon books and patanjali ayurved in all of these holy books of indus civilization these books are the bible's of India and in every book the importance of the semen retention is mentioned clearly)
Oct 20, 2024
0
#18
if you are not satisfied by this please don't write something bad about it because these books are very holy for us Indians 
Oct 20, 2024
0
#19
magipi wrote:
RVSP16 wrote:
magipi wrote:
"Sigma male" isn't a thing. It's just some dumb internet slang.
I believe in it science says when a male gets the control over his mind and leaves attraction of the opposite gender some sort supernatural-power grows in the masculine body we is in short "celibacy'' and in internet language ''sigma male''.
I really hope that you are trolling. If you really believe that, you should probably seek professional help.
Sir I dont need professional guidance this what I am telling is the Indian science which is called ''Bhramacharya'' search this on google
Aha ha, so NOT in science, but in some holy books. So it's not fact, it's (by definition) belief. Don't get me wrong, people can adhere to whichever holy book they deem fit and follow the rules as they like as long as they don't make other people's lives miserable with it, we already have enough ways to make each other's lives miserable
You can pursue your beliefs and I hope they make your life happier/better, but don't try to pass them off as science please.