Sorry, I forgot to include the game.
Was there a way to win after move 27 for white (me)?
Sort:
1 day ago
0
#4
At move 28 you should have done gxf5, not Rf1. You could’ve won a pawn. And a pawn in the endgame is not nothing.
1 day ago
0
#5
If you could have won depends on the moves of your opponent, but you would have had an advantage.
1 day ago
0
#6
This game makes no sense from start to finish but white was completely winning on move 10.
1 hr ago
0
#7
borovicka75 hat geschrieben:
This game makes no sense from start to finish but white was completely winning on move 10.
I mean, I am not very good so theres that... Sorry for not being better.
Pawn snatching, hm maybe could have made a difference. Or maybe move 53 instead of moving the king, I should have started pushing the pawn?
I played this game, and it ended in a draw. THe board was still fairly full, yet I played best move according to the engine almost all the way to the end. Not sure what I could have played different there.
I moved the rook over for move 28 to pin it to the king and create more defence.
Soo... was the game already over so many moves early on?
I felt that in the end situation, with the black rook on the backrank, my pawn infront of the king, after I snatched the black pawn at move 51 (he didn't cut off my approach for some reason), I felt that there should be a way to promote the pawn there. I traded the rooks, which was not the best move as it led to the draw, but even though I sort of saw it coming, I didn't know what else to do so I just went with it and hoped for a mistake on his side, although I didn't exactly expect it.