Openings should not be your concern until you reach a much higher level.
I do play 1.d3 with White, and basically 1...-d6 (Philidor Defense and Old Indian Defense) with Black. It's waaaaay enough.
Focus on scanning properly the board before each move. Begin learning Middle game and Endgame once you're about 1200. Tactics is what you calculate while playing: it's best if no one tells you is there is some available tactics: if you missed one, you'll see it during the analyse of the game.
Thank you but e4 has to much possibility to leave behind
Should I play 4 knights or danish or kings gambit or legals which is just classic than whites knight gets pinned to the queen namaste xe5 q sacrifice bishop and helper check on h7 nd5 mate
I just really n3ed a response to e5
hello i use indian defense and attack but i wanna ask is it good?
1.e4 sure has a high potential. Sadly, everybody soon knows how to neutralize each and every potential threat induced by 1.e4, and soon you'll realise that's it's hard not to find yourselmf in a difficult position against an opponent who masterizes a Defense you don't know well. A typicall example be the Scandinavian Defense, and other example is the Alekhine Defense...
Ans so, soon you end up in need to learn tons of variations against each Black Defense, and since you won't be learning chess itself because you're busy with memorizinf opening lines, you'll find yourself so often is positions you just don't understand at all.
But okay, look, have it your way, I don't care.
hello i use indian defense and attack but i wanna ask is it good?
No, which is why I play it.
The Vienna is awesome.
And so is the Queen's Gambit.
The London is great also.
And it's only half a joke: lesser openings (not losing openings) are less played, for being less promising, hence less studied, hence less known. In the end, you find yourself with the upper hand more than in turn.
On chess.com, I've win a dozen games against players rated 2000-2200 like this:
You'll never beat a 2100 in 4 moves by playing 1.e4, lol 
Anyhow, I told my bit, now I'm outa here.
The Ponziani (1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. c3) can be an interesting one. So far I've had some success with it, but it was mostly because the opponents I used it on were pretty terrible. For me, I've found that it addresses my problem of trapping my own pawns in favor of development and ending up in a position that's super duper cramped fairly well.
I also like the Scotch (1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4). It gives you a decent center and room to develop, and allows you to bring the queen out fast — without any of the negatives associated with it — if your opponent plays the moves a noob would likely play.
I like quick victory so kings is at its best 1e4 e5 2 f4 3xf4 3 nf3 d5 4n c3 dxe4 5 nxe4 bg4. 6qe2 7 double check check matebxf3 nf6
Danish goes like 1 e5 d4 exd4 c3 dxc3 bb5 cxb2 bxb2 kf6 kc3 bb4 ke2 kxe4 oo kxc3 kxc3 oo kd5 bc5 kf7 g xf7 qg4 check king h8 qh4 ? Bishop a8ms h7 ?? Check mate
K for knight
Hey every body . 8i used to play kings gambit than dan8sh gambit best variation than I switched to jobova London 5han back to danish to 4 knights nbrifly rio Lopez than back to danish than legals mate a ND nearly a few days ago back to danish. Pleas tell me which opening is best for below one thousand.