What rating is 50th, 75th, and 95th percentile?

Sort:
rychessmaster1

99.9 :-)

NilsIngemar

I think you will find that as you get higher in the rankings, rating points are easier to get. There are so few of them compared to the rest of the site, so higher rated players milk the moderately high who milk the rest of us.

 

So a 1200 would have a different ratings comparison to FIDE rating compared to a 2200.

 

If a 2200 is actually a 2000 FIDE, then a 1200 here might actually be a 1200 or 1250 FIDE. 

blueemu
NilsIngemar wrote:

I think you will find that as you get higher in the rankings, rating points are easier to get.

I have exactly the opposite impression, that the difference between a 2300 player and a 2400 player is much greater than the difference between a 1300 player and a 1400 player.

NilsIngemar
blueemu wrote:
NilsIngemar wrote:

I think you will find that as you get higher in the rankings, rating points are easier to get.

I have exactly the opposite impression, that the difference between a 2300 player and a 2400 player is much greater than the difference between a 1300 player and a 1400 player.

You obviously missed the point.  It was only about comparing chess.com ratings to FIDE ratings.

 

The higher up the ratings you go, the more inflated the rating.

Deranged
NilsIngemar wrote:
blueemu wrote:
NilsIngemar wrote:

I think you will find that as you get higher in the rankings, rating points are easier to get.

I have exactly the opposite impression, that the difference between a 2300 player and a 2400 player is much greater than the difference between a 1300 player and a 1400 player.

You obviously missed the point.  It was only about comparing chess.com ratings to FIDE ratings.

 

The higher up the ratings you go, the more inflated the rating.

Nah I disagree.

This is just something people with a <1200 Chess.com rating like to tell themselves to feel better.

Paul1e4

Are the US Chess percentiles relevant? I suspect there are a lot of people who played in one or two tournaments, wound up with a sub-1000 rating, and never played again. If these inactive players count, then the percentiles don't mean much.

NilsIngemar
joshuagambrell wrote:

I'm 1365 USCF and my member page says I am 75.4th percentile.

I think this helps to support my idea.

NilsIngemar

Well maybe not, lol.

remarkoble

I’m 1351 and mine says 94% percentile.

Habanababananero

Around my rating in rapid is 95 percentile. Like 1370 and I am at the moment 1390…

VioletCorgi04

My RAPID ELO is 1500 with 96.6 percentage

Sonic_Supers

HDSa

Nyutixbrother

on lichess, 2200 rapid (my rating) scores 98%

happydogtuffy

here I 65 in rapid, 70 in daily

James-17080

With respect to chess puzzles, where is it that you can find your percentile?

James-17080

Out of curiousity, how do you get banned from Chess.com? This would seem to be almost impossible, unless you were somehow cheating.

Elroch
Nyutixbrother wrote:

on lichess, 2200 rapid (my rating) scores 98%

Here 2040 ish (mine) is 99.7%

happydogtuffy
James-17080 wrote:

Out of curiousity, how do you get banned from Chess.com? This would seem to be almost impossible, unless you were somehow cheating.

well u could curse ur head off

ClemTigs

Just to add, I’m 578 and 47th Percentile. So that would suggest that 600 on Chess.com is about the 50th percentile currently.

Fr3nchToastCrunch

The percentile does not account for sandbaggers who get super low elo on purpose. The actual average is probably closer to 1000-1200. There's no way in hell I'm better than 70% of people.