What the hell is a dynamic game?
Sort:
I kinda think of it like this. There’s two basic types of games and players.
Dynamic Vs. Static
A dynamic player is someone who will play for an active position at the cost of his material and long term structure. Think games of Bobby Fischer, Garry Kasparov and Paul Morphy.
A static player is someone who plays for a long term positional advantage, like an extra pawn, the two bishops, better pawn structure etc. Think of games of Anatoly Karpov and Tigran Petrosian.
I hope this helps you.
Dynamic Vs. Static
A dynamic player is someone who will play for an active position at the cost of his material and long term structure. Think games of Bobby Fischer, Garry Kasparov and Paul Morphy.
A static player is someone who plays for a long term positional advantage, like an extra pawn, the two bishops, better pawn structure etc. Think of games of Anatoly Karpov and Tigran Petrosian.
I hope this helps you.
Dynamic Chess Strategy by Mihai Suba
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708233425/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review775.pdf
https://www.newinchess.com/media/wysiwyg/product_pdf/9028.pdf
How to Play Dynamic Chess by Valeri Beim
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708094649/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review471.pdf
http://www.gambitbooks.com/pdfs/How_to_Play_Dynamic_Chess.pdf
Feb 17, 2019
0
#5
A great example of a dynamic game is the Danish gambit. I'll attach the first few moves of it, if fully accepted by black.
As you can see, white has an amazing positional advantage: both bishops are developed and pointing to black's king side, their queen is in prime position to advance, and there are several semi-open files to make plays on. Black, on the other hand, has gone 4 moves and all he has to show for it is a missing e-pawn. This is what we call a dynamic game.
In a discussion about this opening, my friend put it as, "this is a dynamic game where if black is allowed to develop, white loses." Now, of course, this is somewhat of an exaggeration, but white is, in fact, two pawns down in material. As Homsar puts it, it is an active position at the cost of his material. Dynamic games allow the attacker to make sharp, tactical plays at will, but he needs to stay on his toes to make sure their opponent does not restabilize his position, or else he will be down material with no positional compensation.
I know this response isn't necessarily short or neat, but I think it's important to know the advances and drawbacks of such a situation/game with detail to avoid misconceptions or generalizations.
Feb 18, 2019
0
#6
Homsar wrote:
Dynamic Vs. Static
A dynamic player is someone who will play for an active position at the cost of his material and long term structure. Think games of Bobby Fischer, Garry Kasparov and Paul Morphy.
A static player is someone who plays for a long term positional advantage, like an extra pawn, the two bishops, better pawn structure etc. Think of games of Anatoly Karpov and Tigran Petrosian.
A dynamic player is someone who will play for an active position at the cost of his material and long term structure. Think games of Bobby Fischer, Garry Kasparov and Paul Morphy.
A static player is someone who plays for a long term positional advantage, like an extra pawn, the two bishops, better pawn structure etc. Think of games of Anatoly Karpov and Tigran Petrosian.
I think you put Fischer in the wrong list. He was not a "Paul Morphy"-type player... this is a revisionist misconception. Instead, he was known as a deadly accurate positional player, who would gladly undergo an enemy attack if he could thereby win a Pawn or gain the Bishop pair. The "Fischer end-game" was defined by a superior Bishop vs Knight.
what is this reward
Feb 18, 2019
0
#8
Dynamics is like a spring, ready to release the energy at once. Fianchettoes are latent dynamism, the Hedgehog is full of dynamism. Suba is the Maestro! I like his book and approach.
Feb 18, 2019
0
#9
I believe my first response is the shortest so far. I’m awaiting my reward with bated breath.
Feb 18, 2019
0
#10
Here‘s a game which shows the latent dynamism of „passive“ pieces (Bb7, Re8).
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1133873
A dynamic game is an in-balance. So 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd 4. Nxd has the in-balance of black has both centre pawns white has one. White has a half open d-file, Black has a half-open c-file.
Some people regard a dynamic game to be material in-balance, a knight for a bishop or a rook for knight and two pawns, etc.
Thanks for the lesson guys. Ima try some new strats
Feb 18, 2019
0
#13
A dynamic position generally means an equal position where the players have many opportunities to change imbalances in reasonable ways.
Opposite of a static game.
which means complex and hard to know what to do is best,every choice will get this lose that ,you still need to make a wise move to take agvatge ,the advantege is also hard to undersatnd,mostly a better position
Another "Static Game" player was Kramnik...some would say Nakamura too, but I dunno...
Again, ¿ what is a dynamic game?.
Shortest response will be rewarded.