well the obvious explanation is that they arent so much weaker. People are actually very very close in skill near the top. If you are a more famous player and only play against high rated opponents in invite only tourneys that can inflate your rating. I never understood the hype about carlsen personally. Sure hes good. But i dont see him being in a different league than all the other super gms.
is this true
In Tromso Carlsen has the opportunity to play provocative chess, just for fun- and this is exactly what he is doing.
He has lost two games -today he lost against Saric, after playing an extremely dubious opening (to pout it mildly), but why should he care? He can get the lost rating points back easily- while in the "serious" tournaments he's participating he has no chances for provocative chess.
For him, the Olympiad is a great chance to play nonsense, and see if he can win, after all.
Could be. But I watched today, and to me he looked pretty tired. And then tonight I saw on Trent's twitter that they were out boozing hard last night.
"Battered. Blame
@MagnusCarlsen entirely, it all went downhill after those shots..."