When you know you're better than your rating but you keep blundering

I know I should have a higher rating than I do but some games are blunder blunder blunder . Does anybody have suggestion about how to stop making silly blunders even just a little bit.  

If you have advice please share! Lots of people would like advice Including me would like to know your insight.     

Here is a example of why I think I should be higher rated:https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/67132144261?tab=review

I am worse than my rating.

Nice game.

I looked back at your rapid game history and noticed something: you don't analyze all of your games, and it seems you in particular avoid analyzing many of your losses.

I think it's essential to analyze your losses, and it's beneficial to analyze your wins, too. When I started analyzing all of my games (not including bullet and blitz) I got above 2000 for the first time, after being stuck at 1900 for more than a year.

Besides analyzing, the tactics and lessons they offer are helpful, too.

This is completely relateble. I'm usually bouncing between 600-700, and I'm on a 3 game win streak, but then the next day, I blunder so many times and so today I lost 3 games and my rating is down to 610, so your not alone

Before you play a move, look for checks, captures, and attacks for your opponent. Also, be aware of any undefended pieces you have and make sure they can't be taken for free.

I'm not sure what you should be doing since your higher rated than me but this is what I always tell lower rated players

Good Idea

I sometime just don't have time. But I do tatics and other important stuff. But I will try to analyze more. plus I don't like to lose so it's a pain to go over loses. Thank you for the idea though. 

I do that but sometimes I see ghost. (things that aren't there)

I sometimes take days off. But maybe I should take longer ones.

Most of your stuff has been helpful. Thank you.

There is such a thing as being better than your rating.  But it's not because of blundering.

The two situations I can think of are:

1) Someone who plays lots of unrated games (online or elsewhere), then they start playing in rated games.  They might have the playing strength of a 1600 player but their rating is under 1300 because they haven't played enough games against 1600 players yet.

2) Fast-learning, rapidly improving kids.  Some of them just haven't played enough games against highly rated players for their rating to catch up with their actual playing strength.  Others have had massive improvement since their last rated tournament; their rating from that tournament may have been accurate at the time, but now it doesn't reflect their current playing strength.

Your welcome.

I'd suggest if you don't have time right after the game, when you do have time you could do it then.

I agree that it's more painful to analyze losses, and I used to not analyze most of my losses as well. At a point I just forced myself to analyze all of my games, no matter if it's a win or loss. And it did help.

First of all, that game is not long enough to say much of anything.  Yes, you beat a higher rated player, but not because you outplayed him.  You simply caught him in the opening.  There was no demonstration of any middlegame ideas, nor endgame technique.

Second, rating is a measure of performance.  Thus, if you have played enough games to stabilize your rating, you are not underrated.  So your question is really, "how can I improve?"

@exceptionalfork already provided you with an excellent suggestion there.  Looking at your games, I noticed a few things:

1) You play 1. e4 and 1. c4 roughly equally and are underperforming with both (winning less than 50% of your games).  I would suggest focusing on 1 of those to learn the structures and plans better before picking up the other.  In fact, I would suggest putting away the English for now (as it can transpose into a large number of different structures that will make it difficult for you to improve with).

2). You are missing 1-, 2-, and 3-move tactics quite often in rapid games.

3) You are blitzing out your opening moves.  Several of your recent losses were in under 20 moves where you did not stop to think at critical moments in the opening.  What is the point of playing a 10+0 or 15+10 game when you blitz into a lost position with 8 minutes on your clock?

To get better, you need to do the following:

1) Stop playing on autopilot in the opening.

2) Practice your tactics.

3) Manage your time better.

4) Pick 1 opening for now and stick to it.

you are not better than your rating, it's a very common misbelief. If you keep losing to your equal rated players too often, that means you are not there yet for real. As for blundering-wise, they don't blunder as often as you do.. right? You might even be a bit higher than you should.

Thank you I'll try that. But thank you for humbling me. I switched To the 1.c4 a few months ago.

No worries.  Most people are terrible at self-assessment, so it is often helpful to have someone else point out where you are going wrong (this is why even the best player in history has coaches).

The problem with the English is it is very complex and highly transpositional.  If you enjoy it, feel free to stick with it; however realize your rating progress will likely be slowed for a while as you may end up in a lot of unfamiliar structures increasing the likelihood of blunders.  That said, as your understanding of the structures increases, your rating will make large jumps (you just have to push through the losses, which is where the suggestion to analyze your games becomes very important).  If you decide to stick with it, I can tell you from experience that the most common response on chess.com in the under-1800 sections is 1...e5 (and almost no one in that section knows what they are doing after that - for either color).

"There is such a thing as being better than your rating.  But it's not because of blundering."

Yes, but in all cases, your rating catches up to your performance pretty quickly. The fact is, most players are quite unrealistic about their abilities. They seem to think that blunders shouldn't count! We're all masters if you don't count our blunders!

Yeah this is a type of problem that's hard to get rid of. It's not tactics per se but more like board vision and making sure that when you move a piece in your head that it is moved accurately. One chess teacher I knew used to call it "look ahead" and he thought it was a missing key to chess instruction.

What you can do is solve some difficult (for your level) tactics SLOWLY. Obviously calculate only in your head to simulate game thinking. When you have solved it, write down every variation before checking the book solution. Compare each move in your solution to the book solution and circle the first move you missed. (More on this later.) Now try to figure out why you missed a move, gave a wrong move, etc. Maybe you moved a piece but thought it was still guarding something from its original square. Maybe in one variation a piece went to one square and in a different variation it went to a different square, but you got mixed up and moved it as if it was on the square from the first variation. Etc., etc. There are so many ways to mess up. Figure out what your favorite ways are and get rid of them.

Going back to circling the first move you missed. This is a way of measuring progress. It's really hard to get rid of all thinking errors, but what you can do is stop making mistakes so early. Absolute beginners make mistakes on move 1, experienced players make mistakes on move 2, decent club players make mistakes on move 3, and so on. Based on my own experience I estimate that for strong players pushing out the first mistake on average by one ply (one half-move) is worth about 200 Elo, but of course everybody is different.