I say it all depends on the game u are playing. if it's an open game where the bishop has alot of mobility then the bishop is better.and if it is a closed game where the pawns are locked then ur knight is the piece to have.
Which piece is the best: Knight or bishop?


Look at all these :


I mainly agree with Baseballfan & sniperghost360, but I would say at the beginning the knight would be better & at the middle and end the bishop isin a better position to attack. For example;



A good player (of which I myself am not) would use all their pieces as a cohesive, strategic unit, and not have a real preference for one over the other.
That said.. I like rooks.

A good player (of which I myself am not) would use all their pieces as a cohesive, strategic unit, and not have a real preference for one over the other.
That said.. I like rooks.

I say it all depends on the game u are playing. if it's an open game where the bishop has alot of mobility then the bishop is better.and if it is a closed game where the pawns are locked then ur knight is the piece to have.
Not to mention endgame possibilities too!
In anycase, you need to decide on the given position which is better or worse.

Bishop is generally better 60% of the time, knight is better 40% of the time.
A bishop is better in an open game, the knight in a closed game
A well developed knight is worth far more
A bad bishop is worth far less
Bishops are less effective after one bishop dies.
In endgames the bishop tends to be better again due to mobility.


Please leave your opinion here :) thanks