Stupid vague question
Why can't I kill a piece that puts me in check?
Sort:
Feb 8, 2019
0
#3
Grunts2018 wrote:
Stupid vague question
how is it vague how can I be any more clear you *#$%& retard
[Profanity removed - David, moderator]
Feb 8, 2019
0
#4
You often can capture the piece putting you in check. Your link is to a worthless discussion by the uninformed, not to a chess playing site.
When you are in check, examine
1) can the attacking piece be captured?
2) can the check be blocked by putting one of your pieces in the way?
3) can the king move out of check?
If you are in check by a knight, only 1 and 3 are possible.
If you are in check by two pieces, you must move your king.
When you are in check, examine
1) can the attacking piece be captured?
2) can the check be blocked by putting one of your pieces in the way?
3) can the king move out of check?
If you are in check by a knight, only 1 and 3 are possible.
If you are in check by two pieces, you must move your king.
hazyeyed wrote:
Grunts2018 wrote:
Stupid vague question
how is it vague how can I be any more clear you .... retard
I guess from that reply you are below average IQ, sorry to disturb you
Feb 8, 2019
0
#6
Ziryab wrote:
You often can capture the piece putting you in check. Your link is to a worthless discussion by the uninformed, not to a chess playing site.
When you are in check, examine
1) can the attacking piece be captured?
2) can the check be blocked by putting one of your pieces in the way?
3) can the king move out of check?
If you are in check by a knight, only 1 and 3 are possible.
If you are in check by two pieces, you must move your king.
When you are in check, examine
1) can the attacking piece be captured?
2) can the check be blocked by putting one of your pieces in the way?
3) can the king move out of check?
If you are in check by a knight, only 1 and 3 are possible.
If you are in check by two pieces, you must move your king.
Literally everyone uses google, and everyone I have ever played chess with plays that way the link is a quote from www.jimmyvermeer.com which is a chess website genius
As far as I know you can capture every piece but the king
In my personal situation the queen was putting my king in check and my knight could in any other situation take the queen, but in this situation I could not I was forced to move my king it was only in check by the one piece.
Oh, you mean this game? You're in checkmate, the queen is guarded by the bishop.. https://www.chess.com/live/game/3442661927?username=hazyeyed
Also you don't 'kill' a piece you capture it, this isnt frigging call of duty
Feb 8, 2019
0
#9
Your knight might've been pinned to your king, and moving it would have put you into check?
Feb 8, 2019
0
#10
Grunts2018 wrote:
hazyeyed wrote:
Grunts2018 wrote:
Stupid vague question
how is it vague how can I be any more clear you fucking retard
I guess from that reply you are below average IQ, sorry to disturb you
Yikes imagine being this much of a douche bag over a chess question, you must have a lot of friends
Feb 8, 2019
0
#11
Holmium67 wrote:
Oh, you mean this game? You're in checkmate, the queen is guarded by the bishop.. https://www.chess.com/live/game/3442661927?username=hazyeyed
nope, i don't mean that game
Feb 8, 2019
0
#12
Here, this is what I am referring to, I could not use my knight to take his knight.
https://gyazo.com/257f5c4946c35a8e87fb42261846a8b9
Feb 8, 2019
0
#13
Because it's white's move. If you meant when the black king was on e6 then you couldn't take the knight because it wasn't checking you, it was the queen on e2.
Feb 8, 2019
0
#14
"In my personal situation the queen was putting my king in check and my knight could in any other situation take the queen, but in this situation I could not I was forced to move my king it was only in check by the one piece."
Bxe2 seems like a legal move. I don't see a way for your knight to take white's queen though.
Feb 8, 2019
0
#16
I don't understand either of you but no, it was my move (black) and I couldn't take his knight for my knight...
I thought knights only moved in an L shape it doesn't make sense to me why I was forced to move my king resulting in the loss of my queen I would think I wouldn't be in check unless apparently all of the L counts not just the ending point... which is again how I always played
Feb 8, 2019
0
#18
Tristala wrote:
The Queen had you in check, not the knight.
How does the white queen have me in check? shes not even in the same row
Feb 8, 2019
0
#19
The picture you took is after you moved your king out of check. The queen you in check before you moved you king - while you were trying to take the knight.
Feb 8, 2019
0
#20
MasterofHumiliation wrote:
gingerninja2003 wrote:
This is the game I think he's on about.
It was his fault because he didn't castle at all that game, I can see why the opponent was taking advantage of you. Some things you could've avoided. I don't know if its true what you said that you play IRL, but apparently you are a very inexperienced player if you don't castle at all. Castling is a must.
Yes I am very inexperienced lmao I must not know all the rules properly that's why I came on here to ask for help when I said play IRL I meant played in the past, like me and some friends would very casually play I have probably played 175? games in my entire life and i'm 23 I don't know what castling even is I thought I knew this game better but apparently not
https://gyazo.com/a039c0284c59649f4894b0283774f4c1
I always played chess IRL with friends to where you can kill the piece putting you in check, in this online version I haven't been able to, what gives