No but I organize big prize money tournament on low entry fess
Why the chess.com not organizing prize money tournaments for lower rated players

What is the point of playing among lower rated people for money?
For example in pairing among, 1200 vs 2000, statistically 2000 will get 99% score against 1200.

What is the point of playing among lower rated people for money?
For example in pairing among, 1200 vs 2000, statistically 2000 will get 99% score against 1200.
He means a pool where only lower rated players play....but of course sandbagging will be a serious problem in that case.

What is the point of playing among lower rated people for money?
For example in pairing among, 1200 vs 2000, statistically 2000 will get 99% score against 1200.
He means a pool where only lower rated players play....but of course sandbagging will be a serious problem in that case.
li***** has like a requirement where you have to have a minimum games played
we could do:
To play in this prize tournament, you must have played _____ games, and have been a member for __ months.

What is the point of playing among lower rated people for money?
For example in pairing among, 1200 vs 2000, statistically 2000 will get 99% score against 1200.
He means a pool where only lower rated players play....but of course sandbagging will be a serious problem in that case.
li***** has like a requirement where you have to have a minimum games played
we could do:
To play in this prize tournament, you must have played _____ games, and have been a member for __ months.
Yes that would do

Unless the site gives out the prize money, how can we trust a low rated "stranger" to handle the fees? ("I promise to give the winner the prize money")
This guy just created his account 2 weeks ago and we are to give him fee money?
I have an account on [another site-- VP] but I started this account on chess.com for organizing here and we only appointing the players on the rating basis so no worry of sandbagging

Unless the site gives out the prize money, how can we trust a low rated "stranger" to handle the fees? ("I promise to give the winner the prize money")
This guy just created his account 2 weeks ago and we are to give him fee money?
I have an account on [another site-- VP] but I started this account on chess.com for organizing here and we only appointing the players on the rating basis so no worry of sandbagging
How come you appointing players on rating basis and not worrying of sandbagging ?

Hi all we are organizing a tournament worth 120$ for below 1300 fide rated players
1st prize 50$
2nd prize 40$
3rd prize 30$
Entry fee 10$
Only 15 players are allowed
I am organizing this tournament because i am student and i dont even have a good phone to attend my online classes whenever i attending it is very hanging and heating so if you join and play it is a big help for me and you also get good prizes

Anyone not making a tournament anyone not giving chances for participating in the high prizes tournament for lower rated players can you make a tournament huhh??

I am at atleast giving an offer to win good cash prizes what you doing anyone not doing here
Negatives always welcome

It's a good idea, and you'll find there actually many clubs offering money for smaller rated players but they are organisations the work you have to do, and then all the cheat detecting you have to have a good engine which you need to pay, basically chess.com is willing to use the money for the big dogs, because people want to watch that, it pays back but for smaller rated players? Unless its pogchamps no one would watch ordinary players versus, meaning no revenue and a loss of money
Hi all
I just taked my account and I sawed that chess.com giving prizes worth 100,000$ in the tournaments like titled arena so what's your opinion about and if you like if I make a big prize money tournaments for you all
Share you valuable comments and follow me for more