You Should be Force to Delete Your Chess.com Account

Sort:
EricFleet

If you suggest changing the rules of chess, you should delete your chess.com account and create your own chess website.

 

Discuss.

vaarwel_broek

I believe that was how chess.com was started.

EricFleet
vaarwel_broek wrote:

I believe that was how chess.com was started.

Yes. Before chess.com, you were only allowed to move your pawn one square at a time. They revolutionized the game with the 2 squares on the first move.

BabyRhinoRainbow
vaarwel_broek wrote:

I believe that was how chess.com was started.

please tell me where your avatar is from. It reminds me of THINGS

polydiatonic

Yes stop the nonsense and for cookie and milk and other delicious items come here:

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/quotforce-resignsquot-thank-god-we-finally-have-a-thread-like-this

EricFleet
BabyRhinoRainbow wrote:
vaarwel_broek wrote:

I believe that was how chess.com was started.

please tell me where your avatar is from. It reminds me of THINGS

Petrosian, the greatest chess player of all time.

EricFleet

GMegaMan
BabyRhinoRainbow wrote:
vaarwel_broek wrote:

I believe that was how chess.com was started.

please tell me where your avatar is from. It reminds me of THINGS

david the gnome cartoon

vaarwel_broek
BabyRhinoRainbow wrote:
vaarwel_broek wrote:

I believe that was how chess.com was started.

please tell me where your avatar is from. It reminds me of THINGS

I just happen to see it on Etsy. (http://www.etsy.com/listing/69568968/cute-fox-and-gnome-print?ref=exp_listing)

BabyRhinoRainbow
GM_fishys wrote:
BabyRhinoRainbow wrote:
vaarwel_broek wrote:

I believe that was how chess.com was started.

please tell me where your avatar is from. It reminds me of THINGS

david the gnome cartoon

yaaay

falcogrine
EricFleet wrote:

If you suggest changing the rules of chess, you should delete your chess.com account and create your own chess website.

 

Discuss.

if you have more than 5 posts supporting changing the rules for over 2 days, your account should be deleted.

Ubik42

If you want someone to stop suggesting that other people should delete their accounts if they post threads about rules pertaining to account deletion, and if they in fact want other people to delete said accounts provided everyone else agrees with the rule changes they have proscribed, then and only then should you want them to not post threads about people who do not want certain threads posted about how rule changes should force people to want to delete the accounts of people that do not agree with the first group.

I feel very strongly about this.

falcogrine

could you please restate whatever you feel strongly about? the commas create many different possible meanings

EricFleet
Ubik42 wrote:

If you want someone to stop suggesting that other people should delete their accounts if they post threads about rules pertaining to account deletion, and if they in fact want other people to delete said accounts provided everyone else agrees with the rule changes they have proscribed, then and only then should you want them to not post threads about people who do not want certain threads posted about how rule changes should force people to want to delete the accounts of people that do not agree with the first group.

I feel very strongly about this.

I think we need a thread devoted to this.

EricFleet
cookiemonster161140 wrote:
EricFleet wrote:
 

Hey, that's my avatar and I've copywrited it!

I was sure that you created your account just now to mess with me... but nope, you've been here for 2 years.

Ubik42
falcogrine wrote:

could you please restate whatever you feel strongly about? the commas create many different possible meanings

Ok its probably better if I do it using abstract representative logic.

Let A = people who want to force other people to delete their account.

Let X = people who propose rule changes including rule changes regarding closure of account

Let B = all other people who want accounts closed.

Let C = Everyone who does not want anyone to want to close people's account (regardless of whether the accounts actually get closed or not)

Let D = Everyone who does not want the accounts closed.

Let E = Anyone who does not want everyone to want to close the accounts of people who suggest accounts should always remain open.

Then, [A mod X = (B+E*(D-C))^2] * (B+C+(DQ*))

Q = the moving rating average of people who do not want players to want other players to close accounts.

I hope stating it in algebraic form clarifies things.

EricFleet
cookiemonster161140 wrote:

People who propose changing or complaining about the rules of chess should be banned.

Same for those who complain about vacations (which is essentially the same thing).

The name of this website is chess.com.

Not, "chessvariantsandwhiners.com."

I am raising venture capital as we speak to claim this domain and build the next generation of chess website.

falcogrine
EricFleet wrote:

I am raising venture capital as we speak to claim this domain and build the next generation of chess website.

not if peter gets there first

Petermh5

I disagree with the OP:

I don't believe that chess.com needs to be deleted just because of a simple rule change. In fact, I believe that chess.com can be greatly enhanced by fixing up the game of Chess and taking punitive action against all these rule-exploiting should-be-losers.

falcogrine

no peter, he doesn't want you to delete chess.com, he wants you to delete your chess.com account. slight difference.