Hello!
I don't quite understand how does the evaluation bar work. Let me just show a couple of examples. In the first one the evaluation bar gives +5.50 after 19. Nf3 g6, but we see that the real engine evaluation (in the blue box) is just +4.24. In the second example, 11.f5 is considered as the best move with +1.40, but, again, from the lines in the blue box we see that 11... Bd7 is just not the best move here for black, and the real engine evaluation is +0.51 after 11... gxf5.
These are just two examples from my recent games, sometimes the difference between the "bar evaluation" and the real engine evaluation is much greater. I understand that the computer needs time to improve the analysis, but since the lines are already calculated (and shown in the blue box), why not to use them in the position evaluation?
I could be wrong but the bar on the left may actually going to a different depth than what is shown on the right.
Hello!
I don't quite understand how does the evaluation bar work. Let me just show a couple of examples. In the first one the evaluation bar gives +5.50 after 19. Nf3 g6, but we see that the real engine evaluation (in the blue box) is just +4.24. In the second example, 11.f5 is considered as the best move with +1.40, but, again, from the lines in the blue box we see that 11... Bd7 is just not the best move here for black, and the real engine evaluation is +0.51 after 11... gxf5.
These are just two examples from my recent games, sometimes the difference between the "bar evaluation" and the real engine evaluation is much greater. I understand that the computer needs time to improve the analysis, but since the lines are already calculated (and shown in the blue box), why not to use them in the position evaluation?