And as the link posted by @king2queensside shows, even if the quick after-game analysis says it was perfect a little long chess.com analysis will find some mistakes.
Thats quite cool. everything he did would cause a win imagine you lose with 0 everything. that would mean from chess.coms opinion you couldnt do anything else to win against that deck so that would mean that deck could beat anyone from chess.com its weirdly interesting
Below is a game I recently played, and one I might add listed as follows: 0 Mistakes, 0 Blunders, 0 Missed Wins. I am white, and I played the open so poorly that I almost resigned. I saw a disruptive line that turned the game in my favor.
0 Mistakes, 0 Blunders, 0 Missed Wins
I've lost games with 0 mistakes, 0 blunders, 0 missed wins. Not quite the same as perfect.
I've also blundered atrociously and come back from it and won lol. Usually it's when we both blunder, but once I blundered a rook but somehow zigzagged out of it using my queen to weave this way and that and take a bunch of pieces. Can't remember specifics now.
i played a perfect game