Time running out very fast

Sort:
Da-Vere
IMBacon wrote:

Ever notice how no one ever starts a forum posts complaining about winning due to lag?

So apparently no one has EVER won a game due to lag, bad connection, etc.

Kinda like bad calls only go against your favorite team.

Spot on! Due to the terrible, horrible, no-good latency I’m winning games left and right hand over fist lickety split! I hope chess.com totally ignores all the lag complaints and does nothing to fix the “problem.” In fact, i wish they would make it even slower. Maybe then I’ll stop whining about how difficult it is to improve my lowly game skills and finally get to 1200, 1300, or maybe even 1400 by winning so dang many games because of the latency “problem.” Shoot, I’ll be so happy about it I might even come back to the thread AND POST MY JOY IN ALL CAPS JUST TO SHOW HOW SERIOUS I REALLY AM!

Steven-ODonoghue
speeduptheserver wrote:
Da-Vere wrote:
IMBacon wrote:

Ever notice how no one ever starts a forum posts complaining about winning due to lag?

So apparently no one has EVER won a game due to lag, bad connection, etc.

Kinda like bad calls only go against your favorite team.

Spot on! Due to the terrible, horrible, no-good latency I’m winning games left and right hand over fist lickety split! I hope chess.com totally ignores all the lag complaints and does nothing to fix the “problem.” In fact, i wish they would make it even slower. Maybe then I’ll stop whining about how difficult it is to improve my lowly game skills and finally get to 1200, 1300, or maybe even 1400 by winning so dang many games because of the latency “problem.” Shoot, I’ll be so happy about it I might even come back to the thread AND POST MY JOY IN ALL CAPS JUST TO SHOW HOW SERIOUS I REALLY AM!

I've complained numerous times about freakish lag advantages, only to be followed by games where my opponent gets seemingly endless time. So I lose solely because of the clock and if I play enough games, it more than evens out. That's unacceptable. I'm here to play chess, not a game of chance. Of course this problem will never be fixed completely, but I've suggested that adjusting the rating score is a better solution than rigging the clock (which is grossly inaccurate at best).

And your suggestion has been proved to be a bad idea by multiple members, including a moderator

Karbonade_friet
6 PM, and yes, using only premoves time diminishes by 4 seconds per move. Happy I don’t pay for membership. Very little risk I will any time soon as chess.com isn’t acting on this clear and present quality problem.
ArtemKozirev

@speeduptheserver, Speaking of the silent majority, everytime you post a comment stating a real problem going on at chess.com an army of trolls come after you to tell you it is not important, it does not matter, it does not really happen, or speak something completely off the point trying to divert the conversation, the army of trolls are easily identified, they believe they do a favour to chess.com while it is just the opposite, this thread is another example, chess.com has a big BIG problem with the clocks and the trolls are out there to blame the users, ban the users, gag the users deny the evident problem. When you see this kind of attitude you make the question where do they think they are  going ??? Everyone knows this is a problem at chess.com and in other servers and probably more here than anywhere else, why do they keep denying the problem ???They  should do a good exercise of self criticism and start by apologising for the inconvinience. Denying the problem is an insult to the people that come here and see and know what is evident .

The next thing is if fair play is the motto and clocks do not work reliably where is the fair play ??? Worst of all is the attitude of denying the problem means they agree with the cheating ... or ??? 

ArtemKozirev

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/chess-clocks-simply-do-not-work-so-where-is-the-fair-play

Hume76

I have had this experience countless times but not with 10-15 seconds.  I have watched a 5 second lead evaporate in two moves made faster than my opponent.  I saw once where I had 1.5 seconds and my opponent moved with less than one second...and then I had lost on time as soon as he moved!  Something, maybe many things are wrong, but I will not upgrade my membership.

Lagomorph, you are not reading the comments just offering insults.  I have seen an opponent lose on time when he should have won against me.  Look at the content and retire the ad hominem comments.

Karbonade_friet
Lag.com strikes again. Bullet is unplayable. Bilichess works fine meanwhile.
showmewhatyagot

This just happened to me a few games in a row in bullet and has happened before, hence why I researched it. Every move I would lose 2-3 seconds, even if I pre-moved. My opponents didn’t seem to have the same issue. I rarely watch the clock in bullet but noticed I kept losing on time. So I watched closely for one game and there’s an obvious issue with my clock. Stopped playing after that.

jamesbenton303

ive had time out recently when there was still time on the clock. there is definitely something weird going on

binomine
raghav_786 wrote:

But network lag cannot be in the range of 10-15 seconds.

Network lag can easily be within the range of 10 ~ 15 seconds, especially if the problem is close to you. (either your router or your ISP)

rmc123456
Hume76 wrote:

I have had this experience countless times but not with 10-15 seconds.  I have watched a 5 second lead evaporate in two moves made faster than my opponent.  I saw once where I had 1.5 seconds and my opponent moved with less than one second...and then I had lost on time as soon as he moved!  Something, maybe many things are wrong, but I will not upgrade my membership.

Lagomorph, you are not reading the comments just offering insults.  I have seen an opponent lose on time when he should have won against me.  Look at the content and retire the ad hominem comments.

As a former academic philosopher, I very much like your username.

TheSquaredDuck