cause he is lost
Lol one time a lost a Bishop AND a Knight and in the end I got my opponent's Queen
cause he is lost
Lol one time a lost a Bishop AND a Knight and in the end I got my opponent's Queen
Cos they will probably lose. BTW why we're u looking at your friends games?
Sometimes I just can't get a game and so I look at the friend's game to pass the time...
Yup, there are people who feel lost after they lose their minor piece, Earthling!
Ah I see, Zompire
Hello guys!
So today I watched a game of my friend vs another guy( I don't know that guy ), and that other guy resigned after losing his Bishop. But why?
Just asking
Probably because they give up too easily, or the psychology of just not wanting to play a losing battle. Under 1000 chess.com rating, resigning should almost never be an option because people fail to convert even when a Queen up sometimes (especially several Queens because of it easier to stalemate).
The reason for justifiably resigning is recognizing that you are "lost" and/or no practical chance at winning or drawing. The higher the player ratings, then the more likely they will resign for a few reasons. The first is because they will more accurately assess the position and/or lack of counterplay and secondly is because the opponent is more likely to convert smaller advantages more effectively.
Yup, there are people who feel lost after they lose their minor piece, Earthling!
Ah I see, Zompire
you mean mr.potter
Um....Not mr.potter lol! My name is Anandi or Zompire. My friend's call me by Zompire ( Zombie+Vampire) similarly, I call @AiryWigglyTown as Earthling
The one must have to put a rule to himself to not leave a game whatever he was in a disadvantage.. Because without this, you almostly will leave every game you play. I feel that some player are desperate to play in a "perfect" game.
For me, I don't see any incentive for leaving EXCEPT if your enemy mindlessly start spamming/flagging.
yeah, they just lost a piece and they should watch the video "what to do when you're losing" then they can have courage to continue even if they're down a queen!
Hello guys!
So today I watched a game of my friend vs another guy( I don't know that guy ), and that other guy resigned after losing his Bishop. But why?
Just asking
sometimes it just takes one player to be a pawn up to win when u r 1600 or higher
Yup, there are people who feel lost after they lose their minor piece, Earthling!
Ah I see, Zompire
you mean mr.potter
Nope, he is Zompire
Yup
here is a game which shows that an advantage of only 1 pawn can lead to a win (after move 32) https://www.chess.com/game/live/20940031967
I think mostly is out of respect. I play a lot on the board, and sometimes I know that I'll win on time (I got 3 minutes and opponent under 45 seconds), but the position is totally won for my opponent. Since we're friends playing "unrated" and on the board, I like to pay them respect for getting the better position, even though I'd win on time,
https://www.chess.com/game/live/21150110377
It would make more sense to play on at this level but a 4 or 5 point advantage is a lot in the opening phase. That advantage normally stacks up when you're winning. So resigning is not a bad move if you ask me.
OMG he could have played d4 and win back the Bishop! I know it looks like giving away one more Pawn, but the Queen is also attacked!
hahaha I admit I do it on online chess for ranking points. when my opponent has under 15 seconds, After all, time management is a great part of chess. But I only do it when it's and endgame where the opponent has like 3 or 4 points of material advantage.
If I'm down 8+ material points and he stil got sometime to figure out a check mate, I don't try to rush him on clock. Gotta pay the respect.
I think mostly is out of respect. I play a lot on the board, and sometimes I know that I'll win on time (I got 3 minutes and opponent under 45 seconds), but the position is totally won for my opponent. Since we're friends playing "unrated" and on the board, I like to pay them respect for getting the better position, even though I'd win on time,
That is nice. I hate in blitz and bullet when u r CLEARLY winning and your opponent just spams random moves and u lose on time. It's REALLY annoying
eh not annoying but a little confusing as you pause for a second cause you dont know what happened
hahaha and it's that pause that who's got more time but worse position is looking for.
On bullet I win a lot of games by creating calculating positions for my opponent. Aimchess even said that I'm a player with great time management and creating complications on bullet, but low skills on tactics and capitalization.
Hello guys!
So today I watched a game of my friend vs another guy( I don't know that guy ), and that other guy resigned after losing his Bishop. But why?
Just asking