Mate in 2 moves
Sort:
Of course black would capture with his king! It's not a mate in 2. 
MainframeSupertasker wrote:
Of course black would capture with his king! It's not a mate in 2. yep so in title i said mate in 2
You may only say Mate in 2 if its forced.
then i take down this puzzle
Mainframe what is Black move? Qxh7 there its mate
If Qxh7+ then Qxh7(from black)
yep
Mate in 1 I think
how is it mate in 1?? @typicalmove
Oh White turn first mate in 2 I m thinking its Black turn
he can also capture the queen point hai 
Actually, this is a forced mate in 2 because 1...Kxd4 allows 2.Qb4#.
Yup, you're right!
Jan 15, 2019
0
#15
This is an excellent Mate-in-2 problem, composed by Heathcote more than a century ago.
The idea is that Black, if given the turn in the diagram, is in zugzwang. The BQ cannot move without allowing either 2.Qxh7 or 2.Nf2 mate, and any BB move would permit 2.Qb1 mate. However, with White to play, there's no waiting move that could preserve this zugzwang, e.g. 1.Kh5? h6!, 1.Rh5? Qe3+! In order to mate in 2, White surprisingly abandons the zugzwang and plays a move that sets up a mating threat.